Guthrie John T, McRae Angela, Coddington Cassandra S, Lutz Klauda Susan, Wigfield Allan, Barbosa Pedro
Department of Human Development, University of Maryland, USA.
J Learn Disabil. 2009 May-Jun;42(3):195-214. doi: 10.1177/0022219408331039. Epub 2009 Mar 5.
Low-achieving readers in Grade 5 often lack comprehension strategies, domain knowledge, word recognition skills, fluency, and motivation to read. Students with such multiple reading needs seem likely to benefit from instruction that supports each of these reading processes. The authors tested this expectation experimentally by comparing the effects of Concept-Oriented Reading Instruction (CORI) with traditional instruction (TI) on several outcomes in a 12-week intervention for low achievers and high achievers. Low achievers in the CORI group were afforded explicit instruction, leveled texts, and motivation support. Compared with TI students, CORI students scored higher on posttest measures of word recognition speed, reading comprehension on the Gates-MacGinitie Reading Test, and ecological knowledge. CORI was equally effective for lower achievers and higher achievers. Explicitly supporting multiple aspects of reading simultaneously appeared to benefit diverse learners on a range of reading outcomes.
五年级成绩较差的阅读者往往缺乏阅读理解策略、学科知识、单词识别技能、流利度以及阅读动机。有这些多种阅读需求的学生似乎可能会从支持这些阅读过程的教学中受益。作者通过比较以概念为导向的阅读教学(CORI)与传统教学(TI)在为期12周的针对成绩差和成绩好的学生的干预中对几个结果的影响,对这一预期进行了实验测试。CORI组中的成绩差的学生接受了明确的指导、分级文本和动机支持。与TI组的学生相比,CORI组的学生在单词识别速度的后测、盖茨-麦金蒂阅读测试中的阅读理解以及生态知识方面得分更高。CORI对成绩较差的学生和成绩较好的学生同样有效。同时明确支持阅读的多个方面似乎使不同的学习者在一系列阅读结果上都受益。