Choudhry Swati, Bagga Arvind, Hari Pankaj, Sharma Sonika, Kalaivani Mani, Dinda Amit
Division of Nephrology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India.
Am J Kidney Dis. 2009 May;53(5):760-9. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.11.033. Epub 2009 Mar 5.
To examine whether tacrolimus is more effective and safe than cyclosporine (CsA) in inducing remission in patients with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS).
Randomized controlled trial, nonblind, parallel group.
SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS: Tertiary-care hospital; 41 consecutive patients with idiopathic SRNS, estimated glomerular filtration rate greater than 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2), and histological characteristics showing minimal change disease, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, or mesangioproliferative glomerulonephritis were randomly assigned to treatment with tacrolimus (n = 21) or CsA (n = 20).
Tacrolimus (0.1 to 0.2 mg/kg/d) or CsA (5 to 6 mg/kg/d) for 1 year; cotreatment with alternate-day prednisolone and enalapril.
Patients achieving complete remission (urinary protein-creatinine ratio < 0.2 g/g and serum albumin > or = 2.5 g/dL) or partial remission (urinary protein-creatinine ratio, 0.2 to 2 g/g, and serum albumin > or =2.5 g/dL) at 6 and 12 months; time to remission; proportion with relapses; side effects.
No patient was lost to follow-up. After 6 months of therapy, remission occurred in 18 (85.7%) and 16 patients (80%) treated with tacrolimus and CsA, respectively (relative risk [RR], 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81 to 1.41). Rates of remission at 12 months were also similar (RR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.55). The proportion of patients who experienced relapse was significantly greater in those receiving CsA compared with tacrolimus (RR, 4.5; 95% CI, 1.1 to 18.2; P = 0.01). The decrease in blood cholesterol levels was greater with tacrolimus compared with CsA (difference in mean values, 45.1 mg/dL; 95% CI, 19.1 to 71.2). Persistent nephrotoxicity necessitating stoppage of medicine was seen in 4.7% and 10% patients, respectively. Cosmetic side effects (hypertrichosis and gum hypertrophy) were significantly more frequent in CsA-treated patients (P < 0.001).
Single-center study, small sample size, and short duration of follow-up.
Tacrolimus or CsA in combination with low-dose steroids show similar efficacy in inducing remission in patients with SRNS. Therapy with tacrolimus is a promising alternative to CsA in view of the lower risk of relapses and lack of cosmetic side effects.
探讨他克莫司在诱导激素抵抗型肾病综合征(SRNS)患者缓解方面是否比环孢素(CsA)更有效且更安全。
随机对照试验,非盲法,平行组。
三级医疗中心;41例连续性特发性SRNS患者,估计肾小球滤过率大于60 mL/min/1.73 m²,组织学特征显示为微小病变肾病、局灶节段性肾小球硬化或系膜增生性肾小球肾炎,被随机分配接受他克莫司治疗(n = 21)或CsA治疗(n = 20)。
他克莫司(0.1至0.2 mg/kg/d)或CsA(5至6 mg/kg/d)治疗1年;联合隔日泼尼松龙和依那普利治疗。
患者在6个月和12个月时达到完全缓解(尿蛋白肌酐比<0.2 g/g且血清白蛋白≥2.5 g/dL)或部分缓解(尿蛋白肌酐比为0.2至2 g/g且血清白蛋白≥2.5 g/dL);缓解时间;复发比例;副作用。
无患者失访。治疗6个月后,接受他克莫司和CsA治疗的患者分别有18例(85.7%)和16例(80%)出现缓解(相对危险度[RR],1.07;95%置信区间[CI],0.81至1.41)。12个月时的缓解率也相似(RR,1.14;95%CI,0.84至1.55)。与他克莫司相比,接受CsA治疗的患者复发比例显著更高(RR,4.5;95%CI,1.1至18.2;P = 0.01)。与CsA相比,他克莫司使血胆固醇水平下降幅度更大(均值差异,45.1 mg/dL;95%CI,19.1至71.2)。分别有4.7%和10%的患者出现持续性肾毒性而需要停药。CsA治疗的患者出现美容方面的副作用(多毛症和牙龈增生)明显更频繁(P < 0.001)。
单中心研究,样本量小,随访时间短。
他克莫司或CsA联合小剂量激素在诱导SRNS患者缓解方面疗效相似。鉴于复发风险较低且无美容方面的副作用,他克莫司治疗是CsA的一个有前景的替代方案。