Suárez-Díaz Edna
Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Circuito Exterior de Ciuad Universitaria, Coyoacán, DF 04510, México.
Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2009 Mar;40(1):43-53. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2008.12.006. Epub 2009 Feb 27.
This paper focuses on the consolidation of Molecular Evolution, a field originating in the 1960s at the interface of molecular biology, biochemistry, evolutionary biology, biophysics and studies on the origin of life and exobiology. The claim is made that Molecular Evolution became a discipline by integrating different sorts of scientific traditions: experimental, theoretical and comparative. The author critically incorporates Timothy Lenoir's treatment of disciplines (1997), as well as ideas developed by Stephen Toulmin (1962) on the same subject. On their account disciplines are spaces where the social and epistemic dimensions of science are deeply and complexly interwoven. However, a more detailed account of discipline formation and the dynamics of an emerging disciplinary field is lacking in their analysis. The present essay suggests focusing on the role of scientific concepts in the double configuration of disciplines: the social/political and the epistemic order. In the case of Molecular Evolution the concepts of molecular clock and informational molecules played a central role, both in differentiating molecular from classical evolutionists, and in promoting communication between the different sorts of traditions integrated in Molecular Evolution. The paper finishes with a reflection on the historicity of disciplines, and the historicity of our concepts of disciplines.
本文聚焦于分子进化的整合,这一领域起源于20世纪60年代,处于分子生物学、生物化学、进化生物学、生物物理学以及生命起源与外星生物学研究的交叉点。本文认为,分子进化通过整合不同类型的科学传统(实验性、理论性和比较性)而成为一门学科。作者批判性地吸收了蒂莫西·勒努瓦(Timothy Lenoir)对学科的论述(1997年),以及斯蒂芬·图尔敏(Stephen Toulmin,1962年)在同一主题上提出的观点。按照他们的说法,学科是科学的社会维度和认知维度深度且复杂地交织在一起的空间。然而,他们的分析缺乏对学科形成以及新兴学科领域动态变化的更详细阐述。本文建议关注科学概念在学科双重构型(社会/政治秩序和认知秩序)中的作用。就分子进化而言,分子钟和信息分子的概念发挥了核心作用,既使分子进化与经典进化论者区分开来,又促进了分子进化中整合的不同类型传统之间的交流。本文最后对学科的历史性以及我们学科概念的历史性进行了反思。