Ledgeway Timothy, Hutchinson Claire V
Visual Neuroscience Group, School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
J Vis. 2009 Jan 8;9(1):4.1-9. doi: 10.1167/9.1.4.
This study investigated the spatial frequency selectivity of the human visual motion system using the technique of adaptation in which motion aftereffect (MAE) duration was taken as an index of aftereffect magnitude. Eight observers adapted to two vertically oriented, oppositely drifting, luminance-defined gratings that were spatially separated in the vertical dimension. The spatial frequency of the adaptation patterns spanned a 3-octave range (0.25 to 2 c/deg) and drifted at 5 Hz. Following adaptation (20 s), two stationary test patterns were presented and MAE duration was measured. The spatial frequency difference between the adaptation and test patterns was varied from -2.5 to 2.5 octaves in 0.5 octave steps. MAE tuning functions at the lowest adaptation frequency (0.25 c/deg) were bandpass and reasonably symmetric. However, as the spatial frequency of the adaptation patterns increased, overall MAE duration decreased and the shape of the tuning functions became markedly asymmetric. This asymmetry was characterized by a MAE peak that was centered approximately 1 octave below the adaptation frequency. The results are consistent with recent masking studies (C. V. Hutchinson & T. Ledgeway, 2007) and may reflect either asymmetric spatial frequency selectivity of underlying motion units or frequency-specific interactions (e.g. inhibition) between motion sensors tuned to different spatial frequencies.
本研究采用适应技术,以运动后效(MAE)持续时间作为后效大小的指标,来探究人类视觉运动系统的空间频率选择性。八名观察者适应了两个垂直定向、反向漂移的、由亮度定义的光栅,它们在垂直维度上空间分离。适应图案的空间频率跨度为3个八度(0.25至2周/度),并以5赫兹的频率漂移。适应(20秒)后,呈现两个静止的测试图案,并测量MAE持续时间。适应图案和测试图案之间的空间频率差以0.5个八度的步长在-2.5至2.5个八度之间变化。最低适应频率(0.25周/度)下的MAE调谐函数呈带通且相当对称。然而,随着适应图案空间频率的增加,整体MAE持续时间缩短,调谐函数的形状变得明显不对称。这种不对称的特征是MAE峰值大约位于适应频率以下1个八度处。这些结果与最近的掩蔽研究(C. V. 哈钦森和T. 莱奇韦,2007年)一致,可能反映了潜在运动单元不对称的空间频率选择性,或者是调谐到不同空间频率的运动传感器之间的频率特异性相互作用(如抑制)。