Suppr超能文献

尿动力学评估与侧位尿道膀胱造影术。两种女性尿失禁诊断方法的比较。

Urodynamic assessment and lateral urethrocystography. A comparison of two diagnostic procedures for female urinary incontinence.

作者信息

Grischke E M, Anton H, Stolz W, von Fournier D, Bastert G

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Women's Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1991;70(3):225-9. doi: 10.3109/00016349109006214.

Abstract

We compared urodynamic findings and results of lateral urethrocystography in 84 case. The aim of the study was to establish a possible correlation between anatomic findings and functional results. Clinically, a significantly greater increase in the normal axis of urethral inclination was noted in patients with a urodynamic diagnosis of stress incontinence than in patients with urge incontinence or for normal urodynamic findings. Lateral urethrocystography vis-à-vis urodynamic assessment proved to be a method having high sensitivity (91%) but low specificity. These two methods supply different but complementary data. Together with the patients' medical history, the assessment of their complaints, clinical vaginal examination, and clinical stress test, they offer valuable information for an efficient therapeutic concept.

摘要

我们比较了84例患者的尿动力学检查结果和尿道膀胱造影结果。本研究的目的是确定解剖学发现与功能结果之间可能存在的相关性。临床上,尿动力学诊断为压力性尿失禁的患者,其尿道倾斜正常轴的增加明显大于急迫性尿失禁患者或尿动力学检查结果正常的患者。相对于尿动力学评估,尿道膀胱造影被证明是一种敏感性高(91%)但特异性低的方法。这两种方法提供不同但互补的数据。结合患者的病史、对其主诉的评估、临床阴道检查和临床压力测试,它们为有效的治疗方案提供了有价值的信息。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验