Pakyz Amy L, Oinonen Michael, Polk Ronald E
Department of Pharmacy, VCU School of Pharmacy, MCV Campus, 410 North 12th Street, P.O. Box 980533, Richmond, VA 23298-0533, USA.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009 May;53(5):1983-6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01535-08. Epub 2009 Mar 9.
Many hospital antimicrobial stewardship programs restrict the availability of selected drugs by requiring prior approval. Carbapenems may be among the restricted drugs, but it is unclear if hospitals that restrict availability actually use fewer carbapenems than hospitals that do not restrict use. Nor is it clear if restriction is related to resistance. We evaluated the relationship between carbapenem restriction and the volume of carbapenem use and both the incidence rate and proportion of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from 2002 through 2006 in a retrospective, longitudinal, multicenter analysis among a consortium of academic health centers. Carbapenem use was measured from billing records as days of therapy per 1,000 patient days. Hospital antibiograms were used to determine both the incidence rate and proportion of carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates. A survey inquired about restriction policies for antibiotics, including carbapenems. General linear mixed models were used to examine study outcomes. Among 22 hospitals with sufficient data for analysis, overall carbapenem use increased significantly over the 5 years of study (P < 0.0001), although overall carbapenem resistance in P. aeruginosa did not change. Hospitals that restricted carbapenems (n = 8; 36%) used significantly fewer carbapenems (P = 0.04) and reported lower incidence rates of carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (P = 0.01) for all study years. Fluoroquinolone use was a potential confounder of these relationships, but hospitals that restricted carbapenems actually used fewer fluoroquinolones than those that did not. Restriction of carbapenems is associated with both lower use and lower incidence rates of carbapenem resistance in P. aeruginosa.
许多医院的抗菌药物管理计划通过要求事先批准来限制某些药物的可及性。碳青霉烯类药物可能属于受限药物,但尚不清楚限制其可及性的医院实际使用的碳青霉烯类药物数量是否少于不限制使用的医院。也不清楚这种限制是否与耐药性有关。在一项针对学术医疗中心联盟的回顾性、纵向、多中心分析中,我们评估了2002年至2006年期间碳青霉烯类药物限制与碳青霉烯类药物使用量之间的关系,以及耐碳青霉烯类铜绿假单胞菌分离株的发病率和比例。通过计费记录将碳青霉烯类药物的使用量衡量为每1000个患者日的治疗天数。利用医院抗菌谱来确定耐碳青霉烯类铜绿假单胞菌分离株的发病率和比例。一项调查询问了包括碳青霉烯类药物在内的抗生素限制政策。使用一般线性混合模型来检验研究结果。在22家有足够数据进行分析的医院中,在5年的研究期间,碳青霉烯类药物的总体使用量显著增加(P<0.0001),尽管铜绿假单胞菌的总体碳青霉烯类耐药性没有变化。限制使用碳青霉烯类药物的医院(n = 8;36%)在所有研究年份中使用的碳青霉烯类药物显著较少(P = 0.04),且耐碳青霉烯类铜绿假单胞菌的发病率较低(P = 0.01)。氟喹诺酮类药物的使用是这些关系的一个潜在混杂因素,但限制使用碳青霉烯类药物 的医院实际使用的氟喹诺酮类药物比未限制使用的医院少。碳青霉烯类药物的限制与较低的使用量以及铜绿假单胞菌中碳青霉烯类耐药性的较低发病率相关。