Sucker K
IKU GmbH, Olpe 39, Dortmund, 44135, Germany.
Water Sci Technol. 2009;59(5):867-73. doi: 10.2166/wst.2009.030.
In the German Guideline on Odour in Ambient Air (GOAA) statements about the degree of residential odour annoyance are based on the frequency of recognisable odours and hedonic tone. The use of olfactory standards to adequately estimate the annoyance impact is limited if, for example, worry about adverse health outcomes significantly influences the annoyance response of the population. This report introduces dialogue procedures as complementary measures to consider the complainants' subjective perceptions and worries adequately. At first, it is illustrated that odour exposure and number of odour complaints are not necessarily correlated. Then the "interest analysis" and the five steps of a dialogue procedure are presented. A dialogue procedure can be initiated in "quiet times" - where the focus is on trust building and on the development of adequate communication strategies to promote realistic risk reception - as well as in order to establish a successful conflict resolution process if the issue is complex and emotionally discussed. After that, two examples of handling odour complaints are shown. Finally, considerations applying dialogue procedures as a tool to advance odour annoyance mitigation are outlined.
在德国《 ambient Air中气味指南》(GOAA)中,关于居住气味烦恼程度的陈述基于可识别气味的频率和享乐基调。例如,如果对不良健康结果的担忧显著影响人群的烦恼反应,那么使用嗅觉标准来充分估计烦恼影响是有限的。本报告引入对话程序作为补充措施,以充分考虑投诉者的主观感受和担忧。首先,说明了气味暴露与气味投诉数量不一定相关。然后介绍了“利益分析”和对话程序的五个步骤。对话程序可以在“安静时期”启动——此时重点在于建立信任以及制定适当的沟通策略以促进现实的风险接受——也可以在问题复杂且情绪化讨论时启动,以便建立成功的冲突解决过程。之后,展示了两个处理气味投诉的例子。最后,概述了将对话程序作为推进减轻气味烦恼工具的相关考虑。