Suppr超能文献

符合人体工程学改良苹果采摘桶的果园评估

Orchard evaluation of ergonomically modified apple bucket.

作者信息

Earle-Richardson Giulia, Jenkins Paul L, Strogatz David, Bell Erin M, Sorensen Julie A, May John J

机构信息

New York Center for Agricultural Medicine & Health, Bassett Healthcare, Cooperstown, NY 13326, USA.

出版信息

J Agromedicine. 2006;11(3-4):95-105. doi: 10.1300/J096v11n03_10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

While preliminary laboratory tests indicate that a hip belt reduces the load on the back, neck and shoulders associated with musculoskeletal strain, an orchard trial is needed to more realistically assess both effectiveness and acceptability.

OBJECTIVE

to evaluate the hip belt's effectiveness in three areas: worker acceptance, worker productivity, and one-day muscle fatigue of the back and shoulder.

METHODS

Ninety-six New York apple harvest workers were randomly assigned to use the intervention hip belt or placebo belt for one week. In a second week all workers switched conditions. Subjects were interviewed at the end of each week to ascertain intervention acceptance. Employer records were reviewed to determine bushels picked per day. Subjects also underwent muscle fatigue testing at the beginning and again at the end of one workday during each week.

RESULTS

Ninety-one percent of the subjects favored the intervention hip belt. Use of the intervention did not appreciably slow picking speed (bushels per hour) as compared to placebo (8.8 bu/ hr vs. 8.89 bu/hr). Both were significantly faster than the regular equipment condition (8.13 bu/hr). No significant differences in one-day muscle fatigue were found with intervention use.

CONCLUSIONS

The belt was acceptable to the workers and did not hinder productivity. However, the anticipated ergonomic benefits were not demonstrable using one-day strength testing.

摘要

背景

虽然初步实验室测试表明,髋部安全带可减轻与肌肉骨骼劳损相关的背部、颈部和肩部的负荷,但仍需要进行果园试验,以更实际地评估其有效性和可接受性。

目的

评估髋部安全带在三个方面的有效性:工人接受度、工人生产力以及背部和肩部的一日肌肉疲劳情况。

方法

96名纽约苹果采摘工人被随机分配,使用干预性髋部安全带或安慰剂安全带一周。在第二周,所有工人更换使用情况。在每周结束时对受试者进行访谈,以确定对干预措施的接受程度。审查雇主记录以确定每日采摘的蒲式耳数。在每周的一个工作日开始时和结束时,受试者还接受肌肉疲劳测试。

结果

91%的受试者更喜欢干预性髋部安全带。与安慰剂相比,使用干预措施并未明显降低采摘速度(每小时蒲式耳数)(8.8蒲式耳/小时对8.89蒲式耳/小时)。两者均明显快于常规设备使用情况(8.13蒲式耳/小时)。使用干预措施后,一日肌肉疲劳情况未发现显著差异。

结论

该安全带为工人所接受,且不妨碍生产力。然而,使用一日力量测试未显示出预期的人体工程学益处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验