Schoumans O F, Silgram M, Groenendijk P, Bouraoui F, Andersen H E, Kronvang B, Behrendt H, Arheimer B, Johnsson H, Panagopoulos Y, Mimikou M, Lo Porto A, Reisser H, Le Gall G, Barr A, Anthony S G
Alterra, P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA, Wageningen, Netherlands.
J Environ Monit. 2009 Mar;11(3):506-14. doi: 10.1039/b823239c. Epub 2009 Feb 11.
In EUROHARP, an EC Framework V project, which started in 2002 with 21 partners in 17 countries across Europe, a detailed intercomparison of contemporary catchment-scale modelling approaches was undertaken to characterise the relative importance of point and diffuse pollution of nutrients in surface freshwater systems. The study focused on the scientific evaluation of different modelling approaches, which were validated on three core catchments (the Ouse, UK; the Vansjo-Hobøl, Norway; and the Enza, Italy), and the application of each tool to three additional, randomly chosen catchments across Europe. The tools involved differ profoundly in their complexity, level of process representation and data requirements. The tools include simple loading models, statistical, conceptual and empirical model approaches, and physics-based (mechanistic) models. The results of a scientific intercomparison of the characteristics of these different model approaches are described. This includes an analysis of potential strengths and weaknesses of the nutrient models.
在“欧洲水文循环与污染研究计划(EUROHARP)”中,这是一个欧盟第五框架项目,于2002年启动,有来自欧洲17个国家的21个合作伙伴参与。该项目对当代流域尺度建模方法进行了详细的比对,以确定地表淡水系统中营养物质点源污染和非点源污染的相对重要性。该研究聚焦于对不同建模方法的科学评估,这些方法在三个核心流域(英国的乌斯河、挪威的万斯约 - 霍博尔河和意大利的恩扎河)进行了验证,并将每种工具应用于欧洲另外三个随机选取的流域。所涉及的工具在复杂性、过程表征水平和数据需求方面差异极大。这些工具包括简单负荷模型、统计模型、概念模型和经验模型方法,以及基于物理的(机理)模型。本文描述了对这些不同模型方法特征进行科学比对的结果。这包括对营养模型潜在优缺点的分析。