Kang Sungwook, Kwon Young Dae, You Chang Hoon, Noh Jae Hyung, Kim Sung
Department of Public Health, Daegu Haany University, Gyeongsan, Gyeongbuk, Korea.
Tohoku J Exp Med. 2009 Mar;217(3):243-50. doi: 10.1620/tjem.217.243.
Social health insurance (SHI) has covered only 60% of healthcare payments in Korea; therefore, Koreans rely upon supplementary private health insurance (SPHI) to cover the rest of the payments. SPHI status is assumed to affect clinical treatment and outcome of patients with stomach cancer, which is the most prevalent cancer among Koreans. This study examined the relationships between SPHI and diagnosis, treatment, utilization, and survival among stomach cancer patients. Patients (n = 3,780) who underwent a radical gastrectomy from 2000 to 2003 were examined retrospectively. The mean age of all patients was 58 years, and 1,377 patients (36%) had one or more SPHI plan. Univariate analysis was used to examine differences between SPHI and non-SPHI patients in terms of demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical characteristics, followed by a multiple analysis with adjustment for the above parameters. SPHI patients were 5% more likely to visit a physician (p < 0.001) and were 0.8 times less likely to die (p = 0.03) than non-SPHI patients. In contrast, no difference was observed between the two groups in the stage of cancer at diagnosis, which may reflect the fact that the majority of Korean SPHI plans do not cover cancer screening services. Moreover, no significant difference was detected in the use of adjuvant therapy between groups, because it was covered by SHI. In conclusion, SPHI is a determinant of healthcare utilization and survival among stomach cancer patients. It is necessary for health policymakers to consider the benefits of SPHI in financing healthcare services.
在韩国,社会医疗保险(SHI)仅覆盖了60%的医疗费用;因此,韩国人依靠补充性私人医疗保险(SPHI)来支付其余费用。据推测,SPHI状况会影响胃癌患者的临床治疗和预后,胃癌是韩国最常见的癌症。本研究调查了SPHI与胃癌患者的诊断、治疗、医疗服务利用及生存之间的关系。对2000年至2003年接受根治性胃切除术的患者(n = 3780)进行了回顾性研究。所有患者的平均年龄为58岁,1377名患者(36%)拥有一项或多项SPHI计划。采用单因素分析来检验SPHI患者与非SPHI患者在人口统计学、社会经济和临床特征方面的差异,随后进行多因素分析并对上述参数进行调整。与非SPHI患者相比,SPHI患者看医生的可能性高5%(p < 0.001),死亡可能性低0.8倍(p = 0.03)。相比之下,两组在诊断时的癌症分期方面未观察到差异,这可能反映出大多数韩国SPHI计划不涵盖癌症筛查服务这一事实。此外,两组在辅助治疗的使用上未检测到显著差异,因为辅助治疗由SHI覆盖。总之,SPHI是胃癌患者医疗服务利用和生存的一个决定因素。卫生政策制定者有必要考虑SPHI在医疗服务融资方面的益处。