Øzbay A, Tørring C, Olsen R, Carstens J
Research Laboratory C, Department of Nephrology, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Denmark.
Scand J Immunol. 2009 Apr;69(4):357-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.2009.02226.x.
Acute rejection remains an important cause of renal allograft dysfunction and the need for accurate diagnosis is essential to treat transplant recipients successfully. Molecular markers in urine may serve as a diagnostic tool in acute rejection, but controversy still exists regarding the uniqueness of these biomarkers. We measured mRNA of perforin (PRF), granzyme B (GZMB) and granulysin (GNLY) normalized to cyclophilin B in urine specimens from 24 renal allograft recipients with acute rejection, 12 with bacteriuria, 11 with cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections and 17 controls with stable graft function. Measurements were performed using a real-time polymerase chain reaction assay. mRNA levels (means [95% CI]) for all three markers were significantly higher in recipients with acute rejection compared with controls: PRF (0.23 [0.12-0.42] versus 0.04 [0.02-0.07] P<0.001), GZMB (0.14 [0.09-0.23] versus 0.05 [0.03-0.08] P=0.003), GNLY (0.24 [0.14-0.41] versus 0.06 [0.03-0.11] P=0.001). GZMB and GNLY levels during acute rejection were significantly higher when compared with bacteriuria (P=0.011 and P=0.005 respectively), and PRF level during acute rejection was significantly elevated compared with CMV infection (P=0.015). No significant difference was found when comparing marker levels during bacteriuria and CMV infection to controls. Urinary mRNA levels of PRF, GZMB and GNLY are significantly elevated during acute rejection but not during bacteriuria or CMV infections when compared with recipients with stable graft function. The ability to differentiate acute rejection from bacteriuria and CMV infections was only present for some of the markers, that is why careful consideration should be given before applying this technique to clinical practice.
急性排斥反应仍然是肾移植功能障碍的一个重要原因,准确诊断对于成功治疗移植受者至关重要。尿液中的分子标志物可作为急性排斥反应的诊断工具,但这些生物标志物的独特性仍存在争议。我们检测了24例发生急性排斥反应的肾移植受者、12例有菌尿症的患者、11例感染巨细胞病毒(CMV)的患者以及17例移植肾功能稳定的对照者尿液标本中穿孔素(PRF)、颗粒酶B(GZMB)和颗粒溶素(GNLY)的mRNA水平,并将其标准化为亲环素B。检测采用实时聚合酶链反应法。与对照组相比,所有三种标志物的mRNA水平(均值[95%CI])在急性排斥反应受者中均显著升高:PRF(0.23[0.12 - 0.42]对0.04[0.02 - 0.07],P<0.001),GZMB(0.14[0.09 - 0.23]对0.05[0.03 - 0.08],P = 0.003),GNLY(0.24[0.14 - 0.41]对0.06[0.03 - 0.11],P = 0.001)。与菌尿症相比,急性排斥反应期间GZMB和GNLY水平显著更高(分别为P = 0.011和P = 0.005),与CMV感染相比,急性排斥反应期间PRF水平显著升高(P = 0.015)。将菌尿症和CMV感染期间的标志物水平与对照组比较时未发现显著差异。与移植肾功能稳定的受者相比,急性排斥反应期间尿液中PRF、GZMB和GNLY的mRNA水平显著升高,但菌尿症或CMV感染期间则不然。区分急性排斥反应与菌尿症和CMV感染的能力仅在部分标志物中存在,这就是为什么在将该技术应用于临床实践之前应谨慎考虑的原因。