Pudas-Tähkä Sanna-Mari, Axelin Anna, Aantaa Riku, Lund Vesa, Salanterä Sanna
Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Finland.
J Adv Nurs. 2009 May;65(5):946-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04947.x. Epub 2009 Mar 9.
This paper is a report of a systematic review describing instruments developed for pain assessment in unconscious or sedated intensive care patients.
Intensive care patients who are unconscious or sedated are unable to communicate and therefore recognition and assessment of the pain is difficult. To assess these patients' pain, it is important to use a valid and reliable pain assessment tool.
A systematic bibliographical review was conducted, based on seven databases, covering the period from January 1987 to February 2007. A total of 1,586 abstracts was identified and reviewed, 58 papers were selected for full-text review and nine papers were included in the review.
Two researchers independently reviewed the abstracts and three reviewers extracted the papers. The included papers were evaluated using a quality assessment instrument previously developed to evaluate pain assessment tools.
Five different pain assessment tools were identified that had been used with unconscious or sedated intensive care patients. All five instruments included behavioural indicators and three included physiological indicators. Their psychometric properties varied and it was not possible to deduce their clinical utility.
All instruments were reasonably new. In most of them psychometric testing was in an early stage or even absent. Before any of the reported instruments can be chosen in preference to others, it is essential to test their validity, reliability and feasibility further.
本文是一项系统评价报告,描述了为昏迷或镇静的重症监护患者疼痛评估而开发的工具。
昏迷或镇静的重症监护患者无法进行沟通,因此疼痛的识别和评估较为困难。对于这些患者的疼痛评估,使用有效且可靠的疼痛评估工具非常重要。
基于七个数据库进行了系统的文献综述,涵盖1987年1月至2007年2月期间。共识别并评审了1586篇摘要,选择58篇论文进行全文评审,9篇论文纳入本综述。
两名研究人员独立评审摘要,三名评审员提取论文。使用先前开发的用于评估疼痛评估工具的质量评估工具对纳入的论文进行评估。
识别出五种不同的疼痛评估工具,这些工具已用于昏迷或镇静的重症监护患者。所有五种工具均包括行为指标,三种包括生理指标。它们的心理测量特性各不相同,无法推断其临床效用。
所有工具都相当新。大多数工具的心理测量测试处于早期阶段甚至没有进行。在优先选择任何一种报告的工具之前,进一步测试其有效性、可靠性和可行性至关重要。