Suppr超能文献

三种颈椎固定装置的比较。

A comparison of three cervical immobilization devices.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Emergency Responder Human Performance Laboratory, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA.

出版信息

Prehosp Emerg Care. 2009 Apr-Jun;13(2):256-60. doi: 10.1080/10903120802706195.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Prehospital cervical spinal cord injuries (SCIs) are rare but potentially catastrophic. Although spinal immobilization is resource-intensive, emergency medical services (EMS) personnel commonly immobilize trauma patients to prevent exacerbation of unrecognized SCI during transport. We compared the stabilization properties of a novel rigid, cervical immobilization collar (XCollar) with those of one-piece and two-piece rigid collars commonly used in the prehospital setting.

METHODS

This was a prospective laboratory study of healthy adult volunteers to determine total cervical motion in the horizontal, coronal, and sagittal planes in both seated and supine positions. Goniometric techniques were used to measure head and neck movement after marking anatomic landmarks. Ranges of motion were compared with a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). A Bonferroni correction was applied for multiple comparisons, setting significance at p <or= 0.004.

RESULTS

Twenty-five subjects (11 men; 14 women) completed the study. The subject pool represented a wide range of morphometrics. For most measurements, the XCollar permitted 10-15 millimeters of movement when applied without manual cervical stabilization. This was less than the movement permitted by both comparison collars. On average, the XCollar permitted less than 10 millimeters of movement in the sagittal and horizontal planes when the subject was in the seated position.

CONCLUSIONS

The XCollar provided superior cervical stabilization without augmentation by manual stabilization in healthy adult volunteers in both the seated and supine positions when compared with other one-piece and two-piece rigid cervical collars. Although maximal stabilization was achieved only after the subjects were secured to a long spine board with a cervical immobilization device, the XCollar can provide an acceptable alternative to manual cervical stabilization in situations where the number of patients exceeds the number of EMS providers available to provide care.

摘要

目的

院前颈椎脊髓损伤(SCI)较为罕见,但潜在危害极大。尽管脊柱固定需要耗费大量资源,但急救医疗服务(EMS)人员通常会对创伤患者进行固定,以防止在转运过程中加重未被识别的 SCI。我们比较了一种新型刚性颈椎固定器(XCollar)与在院前环境中常用的一体式和两部件刚性颈椎固定器的固定效果。

方法

这是一项针对健康成年志愿者的前瞻性实验室研究,旨在确定在坐位和仰卧位时,颈椎在水平、冠状和矢状面上的整体运动。采用关节角度测量技术在标记解剖标志后测量头颈部运动。使用单向方差分析(ANOVA)比较运动范围。对多个比较进行 Bonferroni 校正,将显著性水平设置为 p<0.004。

结果

25 名受试者(11 名男性;14 名女性)完成了研究。研究对象涵盖了广泛的体型。对于大多数测量值,XCollar 在未手动固定颈椎的情况下可移动 10-15 毫米。这比两种比较固定器允许的移动范围都小。平均而言,当受试者处于坐位时,XCollar 在矢状面和水平面的移动幅度小于 10 毫米。

结论

与其他一体式和两部件刚性颈椎固定器相比,XCollar 在健康成年志愿者中,无论是坐位还是仰卧位,在不进行手动颈椎固定的情况下,提供了更好的颈椎固定效果。尽管只有在受试者用颈椎固定装置固定在长脊柱板上后才能达到最大固定效果,但在 EMS 提供者人数不足的情况下,XCollar 可为提供颈椎固定提供一种可行的替代方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验