Vanapalli Siva A, Banpurkar Arun G, van den Ende Dirk, Duits Michel H G, Mugele Frieder
Physics of Complex Fluids, Dept. of Science & Technology and MESA + Institute of Nanotechnology, University of Twente, P. O. Box 217, 7500, AE, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Lab Chip. 2009 Apr 7;9(7):982-90. doi: 10.1039/b815002h. Epub 2008 Dec 19.
We integrate a sensitive microfluidic comparator into a T-junction device and report measurements of the excess pressure drop due to a single moving droplet confined in a rectangular microchannel. We specifically focus on drops that are not coated with surfactants and study the effects of drop size, droplet viscosity and capillary number on their hydrodynamic resistance. In the capillary number range of approximately 10(-3)-10(-2), we find two distinct regimes for hydrodynamic resistance behavior based on drop size. In regime I associated with small drops (drop length/channel width approximately <4), we find that the pressure drop is independent of the drop size and the capillary number, and depends weakly on the ratio of the viscosities of the two immiscible phases. In regime II, associated with large drops (drop length/channel width > approximately 4), depending on the viscosity ratio of the two phases, the hydrodynamic resistance could increase, decrease or remain unchanged with drop size. We present a simple model that qualitatively captures these experimental trends. This model reveals that the pressure drop in regime I is dominated by the dissipation due to the end caps, and in regime II by both the end caps and the central body of the droplet. Such fundamental understanding will enable the design of large-scale energy-efficient fluidic circuits by minimizing the overall pressure drop in a network and may also provide insights into controlling droplet traffic to build functional passively-driven two-phase microfluidic technologies.
我们将一个灵敏的微流体比较器集成到一个T型结装置中,并报告了由于单个移动液滴限制在矩形微通道中而产生的过剩压降的测量结果。我们特别关注未涂覆表面活性剂的液滴,并研究液滴大小、液滴粘度和毛细管数对其流体动力学阻力的影响。在大约10^(-3)-10^(-2)的毛细管数范围内,基于液滴大小,我们发现了两种不同的流体动力学阻力行为模式。在与小液滴相关的模式I中(液滴长度/通道宽度约<4),我们发现压降与液滴大小和毛细管数无关,并且对两种不混溶相的粘度比的依赖性较弱。在模式II中,与大液滴相关(液滴长度/通道宽度>约4),根据两相的粘度比,流体动力学阻力可能随液滴大小增加、减少或保持不变。我们提出了一个简单的模型,定性地捕捉了这些实验趋势。该模型表明,模式I中的压降主要由端盖引起的耗散主导,而在模式II中则由端盖和液滴的中心体共同主导。这种基本理解将有助于通过最小化网络中的总压降来设计大规模节能流体电路,并且还可能为控制液滴流动以构建功能性被动驱动两相微流体技术提供见解。