Suppr超能文献

[以S-1为基础的序贯化疗作为晚期/复发性胃癌二线治疗的疗效]

[The effectiveness of S-1 based sequential chemotherapy as second-line treatment for advanced/recurrent gastric cancer].

作者信息

Sugimoto Naotoshi, Narahara Hiroyuki, Sakai Daisuke, Yamamoto Sachiko, Fumoto Shoichi, Yagi Toshinari, Imamura Fumio, Iishi Hiroyasu, Tatsuta Masaharu

机构信息

Dept. of Clinical Oncology, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases.

出版信息

Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2009 Mar;36(3):417-24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We conducted this study to evaluate the efficacy of S-1 combination chemotherapy as second-line treatment for advanced/recurrent gastric cancer that was resistant to S-1 based chemotherapy as first-line treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We evaluated patients included in phase II.III clinical trials, that is SPIRITS trial(S-1 vs CDDP +S-1), GC0301/TOP-002(S-1 vs CPT-11+S-1), OGSG0002(S-1+CPT-11)and OGSG0105(S-1+paclitaxel). Eligibility criteria at first-line included; pathologically proven gastric cancer, adequate bone marrow, hepatic, and renal functions, PS 0-2, no prior therapy, life expectancy estimated > or =12 weeks, age 20-75 years and written informed consent. Endpoints were as follows; )PFS in first-line and second-line, )Time to Second Progression(TSP), 3) OS.

RESULTS

Sixty-six patients were evaluable in this study. We classified these patients into 4 groups according to the protocol. A)S-1 alone in first-line and S-1 combination in second-line(n=7), B)S-1 alone in first-line and other drugs in second-line(n=13), C)S-1 combination in first-line and another S-1 combination in second-line(n=33), D) S-1 combination in first-line and other drugs in second-line(n=13). We compared S-1 combination group(A+C)to other drugs group(B+D)in second-line. In first-line, PFS was 157.5 days in group(A+C)and 130 days in group(B +D)(p=0.2749). In second-line, PFS, TSP and OS were as follows; 72.5, 256.5, 473 days in group(A+C)and 56, 201.5, 398.5 days(PFS; p=0.0806, TSP: p=0.0718, OS: p=0.0204)in group(B+D), respectively. With regards to adverse events, group(A+C)in first-line showed higher frequency in grade 3/4 leukopenia(10%), febrile neutropenia(5%)and grade 3 diarrhea(10%)than group(B+D). In second-line, group(B+D)showed grade 3/4 leukopenia (12%)and neutropenia(8%)than group(A+C). There were no treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that S-1 combination chemotherapy is efficient as second-line for advanced/recurrent gastric cancer that got resistant to S-1 based chemotherapy as first-line.

摘要

背景

我们开展本研究以评估S-1联合化疗作为一线治疗对S-1耐药的晚期/复发性胃癌二线治疗的疗效。

患者与方法

我们评估了纳入II/III期临床试验的患者,即SPIRITS试验(S-1对比顺铂+S-1)、GC0301/TOP-002(S-1对比伊立替康+S-1)、OGSG0002(S-1+伊立替康)和OGSG0105(S-1+紫杉醇)。一线治疗的入选标准包括:病理确诊的胃癌、足够的骨髓、肝和肾功能、体能状态0-2、无既往治疗、预期寿命估计≥12周、年龄20-75岁且签署书面知情同意书。终点如下:1)一线和二线治疗的无进展生存期(PFS);2)至二次进展时间(TSP);3)总生存期(OS)。

结果

本研究中66例患者可评估。我们根据方案将这些患者分为4组。A)一线单用S-1,二线用S-1联合化疗(n=7);B)一线单用S-1,二线用其他药物(n=13);C)一线用S-1联合化疗,二线用另一种S-1联合化疗(n=33);D)一线用S-1联合化疗,二线用其他药物(n=13)。我们比较了二线治疗中S-1联合化疗组(A+C)与其他药物组(B+D)。一线治疗中,(A+C)组的PFS为157.5天,(B+D)组为130天(p=0.2749)。二线治疗中,PFS、TSP和OS如下:(A+C)组分别为72.5天、256.5天、473天,(B+D)组分别为56天、201.5天、398.5天(PFS:p=0.0806,TSP:p=0.0718,OS:p=0.0204)。关于不良事件,一线治疗中(A+C)组3/4级白细胞减少(10%)、发热性中性粒细胞减少(5%)和3级腹泻(10%)的发生率高于(B+D)组。二线治疗中,(B+D)组3/4级白细胞减少(12%)和中性粒细胞减少(8%)的发生率高于(A+C)组。无治疗相关死亡病例。

结论

这些结果表明,S-1联合化疗作为一线S-1耐药的晚期/复发性胃癌的二线治疗是有效的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验