A reader and author respond to "The end of peer review and traditional publishing as we know it".
作者信息
Jones Val
出版信息
Medscape J Med. 2009;11(1):17; author reply 17. Epub 2009 Jan 16.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
A reader and author respond to "The end of peer review and traditional publishing as we know it".
Medscape J Med. 2009;11(1):17; author reply 17. Epub 2009 Jan 16.
2
The Neuroscience Peer Review Consortium.
Eur Psychiatry. 2009 Mar;24(2):69-70. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2009.01.004.
3
Landmark, landmine, or landfill? The role of peer review in assessing manuscripts.
J Pediatr. 2007 Aug;151(2):107-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.05.049.
4
Trends in scientific publishing: Dark clouds loom large.
J Neurol Sci. 2016 Apr 15;363:119-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2016.02.040. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
5
What do journal editors want? … and everything you wanted to know about the peer review process for journal publication.
Nurs Health Sci. 2013 Sep;15(3):263-4. doi: 10.1111/nhs.12092.
6
Avoiding predatory journals: Quick peer review processes too good to be true.
Nurs Forum. 2019 Jul;54(3):336-339. doi: 10.1111/nuf.12333. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
7
Publishing in learned journals.
Indian J Med Res. 2010 Nov;132(5):525-6.
8
Beyond peer review: rethinking scientific publishing with artificial intelligence.
Intensive Care Med. 2024 Oct;50(10):1715-1716. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07559-5. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
9
Would you buy a used car from this editor?
J Ultrasound Med. 2013 Jul;32(7):1107-8. doi: 10.7863/ultra.32.7.1107.
10
Beyond peer review: rethinking scientific publishing with AI. Author's reply.
Intensive Care Med. 2024 Oct;50(10):1717-1718. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07603-4. Epub 2024 Aug 15.
本文引用的文献
1
The end of peer review and traditional publishing as we know it.
Medscape J Med. 2008;10(11):267. Epub 2008 Nov 24.
Zotero 插件