Pathology Department, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología México, Ave San Fernando 22, Tlalpan, México DF, México.
Med Oncol. 2010 Jun;27(2):233-6. doi: 10.1007/s12032-009-9197-9. Epub 2009 Mar 19.
Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in patients with breast cancer has emerged as a conservative and promising procedure. One of the most important issues is the intraoperative evaluation of the SLN with a high degree of accuracy by frozen section and/or imprint cytology. The objective of this study was to test the ability of intraoperative touch imprint cytology (ITIC) to predict metastasis on SLN.
SLNs were freshly examined, bisected in <0.5 cm or serially sectioned at 2 mm intervals on the long axis. Each surface of the section was touched on the glass slide, and stained. Results of ITIC were compared with permanent sections. Sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy (Acc) were calculated. False negatives were reviewed.
We analyzed 179 SLN from 110 patients. The comparison between ITIC and final results of the SLN showed 139 (77.6%) true negative imprints, and 28 (15.6%) true positive. There were 12 (6.70%) false negative (FN) imprints which included 6 macrometastases, 3 micrometastases, and 3 isolated tumor cells. Re-screening after the definitive results of false negative imprints showed again 10 negative imprints, one with two groups of cells and one with multiple groups of cells. The overall Se was 70% (73.6% for micro/macrometastases and 82.3% for macrometastases), Sp and PPV were 100% in all cases. NPV was 92.1% overall (93.4% micro/macrometastases and 96% in macrometastases).Global accuracy was 93.3% (94.4% for micro/macrometastases and 96% for in macrometastases).
ITIC is excellent to detect macrometastases, however, it fails to detect micrometastases. False negative imprints for macrometastases are mainly due to sampling error. The immediate availability, low cost, high Sp, PPV, preservation of the lymph node for histopathologic examination, avoiding of a second surgery are the major advantages of intraoperative evaluation of SLN.
在乳腺癌患者中,前哨淋巴结(SLN)活检已经成为一种保守且有前途的方法。其中一个最重要的问题是通过冷冻切片和/或印片细胞学来对 SLN 进行高度准确的术中评估。本研究的目的是测试术中触诊印片细胞学(ITIC)预测 SLN 转移的能力。
新鲜检查 SLN,将其在 <0.5cm 处对半切开,或沿长轴每隔 2mm 连续切片。将每个切片的表面在载玻片上触摸,然后染色。将 ITIC 的结果与永久切片进行比较。计算灵敏度(Se)、特异性(Sp)、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)和准确性(Acc)。审查假阴性结果。
我们分析了 110 名患者的 179 个 SLN。ITIC 与 SLN 最终结果的比较显示,139 个(77.6%)印片为真阴性,28 个(15.6%)为真阳性。有 12 个(6.70%)假阴性(FN)印片,包括 6 个大转移、3 个微转移和 3 个孤立肿瘤细胞。在假阴性印片的明确结果后再次重新筛查,再次显示 10 个阴性印片,一个有两组细胞,一个有多个细胞组。总体 Se 为 70%(微/大转移为 73.6%,大转移为 82.3%),Sp 和 PPV 在所有病例中均为 100%。NPV 总体为 92.1%(微/大转移为 93.4%,大转移为 96%)。总体准确性为 93.3%(微/大转移为 94.4%,大转移为 96%)。
ITIC 非常适合检测大转移,但不能检测微转移。大转移假阴性印片主要是由于取样误差。术中评估 SLN 的主要优点是即时可用性、低成本、高 Sp、PPV、保存淋巴结进行组织病理学检查、避免二次手术。