Hansen Britt Saetre, Severinsson Elisabeth
Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Stavanger Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Nurs Health Sci. 2009 Mar;11(1):71-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2018.2009.00433.x.
The aim of this paper is to identify physicians' perceptions of protocol-directed weaning from mechanical ventilation in an intensive care unit in Norway. Errors occur in the absence of procedures, plans, and a team culture. Standardized weaning protocols, or pathways, offer a systematic approach. The focus group method was used. Four themes emerged: (i) acceptance, where the participants perceived the protocol as having a positive influence on the weaning process, although some barriers were identified, such as its failure to facilitate the "difficult-to-wean" patient; (ii) indignant responses, which gave the impression that the protocol was prescribed for the benefit of the nurses; (iii) ambivalence was evident in the two different approaches to the weaning process when problems occurred, which were "directing" and "collaborating"; and (iv) continuity and professional competence were perceived as important aspects of the weaning process. An unclear pattern of responsibility and poor interprofessional collaboration and communication were reported.
本文旨在确定挪威一家重症监护病房的医生对机械通气方案指导下撤机的看法。在缺乏程序、计划和团队文化的情况下会出现错误。标准化撤机方案或路径提供了一种系统的方法。采用了焦点小组法。出现了四个主题:(i)接受,参与者认为该方案对撤机过程有积极影响,尽管也发现了一些障碍,比如它未能帮助“难以撤机”的患者;(ii)愤怒反应,给人的印象是该方案是为了护士的利益而制定的;(iii)当出现问题时,撤机过程中的两种不同方法“指导”和“协作”表现出矛盾心理;(iv)连续性和专业能力被视为撤机过程的重要方面。报告称责任模式不明确,跨专业协作与沟通不佳。