Harrison School of Pharmacy, Auburn University, AL, USA.
Ann Pharmacother. 2009 Apr;43(4):692-9. doi: 10.1345/aph.1L373. Epub 2009 Mar 18.
To review studies evaluating the use of midodrine and octreotide in hemodynamic complications of cirrhosis, including ascites and hepatorenal syndrome.
Searches of MEDLINE (1966-September 2008) and EMBASE (1974-September 2008) were conducted using the terms midodrine, octreotide, hepatorenal syndrome, ascites, cirrhosis, and paracentesis-induced circulatory dysfunction. Literature review was limited to English-language, human studies.
Studies identified from data sources were considered for review. Studies were excluded if primary therapy involved any of the following: transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt procedure, medications other than midodrine or octreotide, or patients included for treatment or prevention of portal hypertension and/or variceal bleeding. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies and studies using retrospective data collection were excluded. Seven studies were included in this review.
Midodrine and octreotide in combination or alone have shown conflicting results for systemic and renal hemodynamics and renal function in patients with cirrhosis-related complications. Patients with ascites being treated with midodrine, alone or in combination with octreotide, showed significant changes in systemic hemodynamics, without a correlating change in renal perfusion. Studies comparing the use of midodrine with use of albumin for the prevention of paracentesis-induced circulatory dysfunction (PICD) showed no incidence of PICD in either treatment group. In hepatorenal syndrome, patients using midodrine with octreotide showed significant changes in systemic hemodynamics and improvements in renal perfusion. This regimen's effect on survival is yet to be determined.
Available evidence shows inconsistent results for the effectiveness and safety of midodrine and octreotide use in cirrhotic patients. Because of the contradictory results, longer treatment duration and increased number of study participants are necessary to determine the proper use of midodrine and octreotide in these patients.
回顾评估米多君和奥曲肽在肝硬化相关的血流动力学并发症(包括腹水和肝肾综合征)中应用的研究。
检索 MEDLINE(1966 年至 2008 年 9 月)和 EMBASE(1974 年至 2008 年 9 月),使用的术语有米多君、奥曲肽、肝肾综合征、腹水、肝硬化和穿刺抽液后循环功能障碍。文献综述仅限于英语和人类研究。
从资料来源中鉴定的研究被认为可用于综述。如果主要治疗包括以下任何一种情况,则排除该研究:经颈静脉肝内门体分流术、米多君或奥曲肽以外的药物、包括治疗或预防门静脉高压和/或静脉曲张出血的患者。排除药代动力学/药效学研究和使用回顾性数据收集的研究。共有 7 项研究被纳入综述。
米多君和奥曲肽联合或单独应用于肝硬化相关并发症患者,在全身和肾脏血流动力学以及肾功能方面的结果不一致。单独或联合奥曲肽使用米多君治疗腹水的患者,全身血流动力学有显著变化,但肾灌注无相应变化。比较米多君和白蛋白用于预防穿刺抽液后循环功能障碍(PICD)的研究显示,两组均未发生 PICD。在肝肾综合征中,米多君联合奥曲肽应用的患者全身血流动力学有显著变化,肾灌注得到改善。该方案对生存率的影响仍有待确定。
现有证据对米多君和奥曲肽在肝硬化患者中的应用的有效性和安全性的结果不一致。由于结果相互矛盾,需要更长的治疗时间和更多的研究参与者来确定米多君和奥曲肽在这些患者中的适当应用。