Burstow M, Kelly T, Panchani S, Khan I M, Meek D, Memon B, Memon M A
Department of Surgery, Ipswich Hospital, Ipswich, Queensland 4305, Australia.
Dis Esophagus. 2009;22(6):519-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2009.00948.x. Epub 2009 Mar 6.
Greater than 50% of patients with esophageal carcinoma are found to be incurable at the time of diagnosis, leaving only palliative options. Self-expanding metal stents (SEMs) are effective for relieving symptoms and complications associated with esophageal carcinoma and improving quality of life. We undertook a retrospective analysis to evaluate the experience of palliative esophageal stenting for symptomatic malignant dysphagia in our institution over a period of 7 years. Between January 1999 and January 2006, 126 patients who received SEMs for malignant dysphagia were identified using an upper gastrointestinal specialist nurse clinician database. Data were obtained from patient case notes, endoscopy, histopathology, radiology, and external agency databases. Of the 126 identified, 36 patients were excluded from the analysis. A number of variables including age, sex, presenting complaints, type of stent, indications of stenting, success or failure of stent insertion, survival rate, and complication rate were analyzed. Of the 90 patients, 55 (61%) were male and 35 (39%) were female. The mean age of patients was 70.79 (range 40-97) years. The predominant presenting complaints were dysphagia (n = 81) and weight loss (n = 48). The indication for stenting was worsening dysphagia in all patients. Tumors were confined to the distal esophagus and esophagogastric junction in 73 patients (81%), and the mid-esophagus in 17 (19%). Adenocarcinoma was identified in 61 patients (67.8%) and squamous cell carcinoma in 29 (32.2%). Stenting numbers were comparable in endoscopic and radiologic groups (47 vs. 43), with successful stent deployment in 89 patients. The 7- and 30-day mortality was 9% (n = 8) and 28% (n = 25), respectively. Comparable numbers of early deaths were seen in both radiologic (n = 13) and endoscopic (n = 12) groups. Causes of early inpatient death included hemorrhage (n = 5), pneumonia (n = 7), exhaustion (n = 2), cardiac causes (n = 3), perforation (n = 1), and sepsis (n = 1). The number of patients with complications was 41 (45.6%), 25 in the surgical group and 15 in the radiologic group; the difference was not significant (P = 0.13). The mean survival time was 92.5 (0-638) days and median survival time was 61 days. A subgroup of patients with complete dysphagia (score 4) gained a mean survival of 59 days. Those patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy survived significantly longer than those receiving stenting alone (152.8 days vs. 71.8 days). There is no significant difference in complications or survival when using endoscopic or radiologic methods to deploy SEMs in patients with inoperable esophageal cancer. Mortality is low; however, the morbidity rate is significant. Patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy, in addition to stenting, survived significantly longer than those with a stent only.
超过50%的食管癌患者在诊断时即被发现无法治愈,仅能采取姑息治疗方案。自膨式金属支架(SEMs)对于缓解与食管癌相关的症状和并发症以及改善生活质量有效。我们进行了一项回顾性分析,以评估我院7年间对有症状的恶性吞咽困难患者进行姑息性食管支架置入的经验。1999年1月至2006年1月期间,使用上消化道专科护士临床医生数据库确定了126例因恶性吞咽困难接受SEMs的患者。数据来自患者病历、内镜检查、组织病理学、放射学和外部机构数据库。在确定的126例患者中,36例被排除在分析之外。分析了包括年龄、性别、主诉、支架类型、支架置入指征、支架置入成功或失败、生存率和并发症发生率等多个变量。90例患者中,55例(61%)为男性,35例(39%)为女性。患者的平均年龄为70.79岁(范围40 - 97岁)。主要主诉为吞咽困难(n = 81)和体重减轻(n = 48)。所有患者支架置入的指征均为吞咽困难加重。73例(81%)肿瘤局限于食管远端和食管胃交界处,17例(19%)位于食管中段。61例(67.8%)为腺癌,29例(32.2%)为鳞状细胞癌。内镜组和放射学组的支架置入数量相当(47例对43例),89例患者支架成功置入。7天和30天死亡率分别为9%(n = ⑧)和28%(n = 25)。放射学组(n = 13)和内镜组(n = 12)的早期死亡人数相当。早期住院死亡原因包括出血(n = 5)、肺炎(n = 7)、衰竭(n = 2)、心脏原因(n = 3)、穿孔(n = 1)和脓毒症(n = 1)。发生并发症的患者有41例(45.6%),手术组25例,放射学组15例;差异无统计学意义(P = 0.13)。平均生存时间为92.5天(0 - 638天),中位生存时间为61天。完全吞咽困难(评分4分)的患者亚组平均生存59天。接受辅助化疗或放疗的患者比仅接受支架置入的患者存活时间显著更长(152.8天对71.8天)。对于无法手术的食管癌患者,使用内镜或放射学方法置入SEMs时,并发症或生存率无显著差异。死亡率较低;然而,发病率较高。除支架置入外还接受辅助化疗或放疗的患者比仅置入支架的患者存活时间显著更长。