Kuhn Gustav, Kingstone Alan
Department of Psychology, University of Durham, Durham, England.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2009 Feb;71(2):314-27. doi: 10.3758/APP.71.2.314.
The present study investigates how people's voluntary saccades are influenced by where another person is looking, even when this is counterpredictive of the intended saccade direction. The color of a fixation point instructed participants to make saccades either to the left or right. These saccade directions were either congruent or incongruent with the eye gaze of a centrally presented schematic face. Participants were asked to ignore the eyes, which were congruent only 20% of the time. At short gaze-fixation-cue stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs; 0 and 100 msec), participants made more directional errors on incongruent than on congruent trials. At a longer SOA (900 msec), the pattern tended to reverse. We demonstrate that a perceived eye gaze results in an automatic saccade following the gaze and that the gaze cue cannot be ignored, even when attending to it is detrimental to the task. Similar results were found for centrally presented arrow cues, suggesting that this interference is not unique to gazes.
本研究探讨了人们的自主扫视如何受到他人注视方向的影响,即使这与预期的扫视方向相反。注视点的颜色指示参与者向左或向右进行扫视。这些扫视方向与中央呈现的示意性面孔的目光注视方向要么一致,要么不一致。参与者被要求忽略眼睛,眼睛方向一致的情况仅占20%。在较短的注视固定提示刺激开始时间间隔(SOA;0和100毫秒)时,与一致试验相比,参与者在不一致试验中出现的方向错误更多。在较长的SOA(900毫秒)时,这种模式倾向于逆转。我们证明,感知到的目光注视会导致自动跟随注视方向的扫视,并且注视提示不能被忽略,即使关注它对任务不利。对于中央呈现的箭头提示也发现了类似的结果,这表明这种干扰并非目光注视所独有。