Suppr超能文献

CHOP-21 方案治疗不良预后霍奇金淋巴瘤:一项探索性研究。

CHOP-21 for unfavorable Hodgkin's lymphoma. An exploratory study.

机构信息

The Maria Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Institute and Cancer Centre, Warszawa, Poland.

出版信息

Med Oncol. 2010 Jun;27(2):262-7. doi: 10.1007/s12032-009-9202-3. Epub 2009 Mar 25.

Abstract

ABVD remains a standard chemotherapy for Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) despite many efforts to demonstrate the superiority of other regimens. Bleomycin was proven marginally active in this combination (J Clin Oncol 22:1532-3, 2004) but adding significant toxicity. Response to ABVD is often slow and relapse rate of 20-30% is a concern. ABVD has never been directly compared to CHOP, the other global standard for other lymphomas that is composed of agents certainly active in HL. Current study is an update on our initial report of 2004 (Blood 104, 2004). In addition to extending the follow-up, we compared outcome after CHOP in a pilot series of previously untreated patients with a retrospective results of ABVD therapy at our institution. CR/CRu rates were 88 and 62% for CHOP and ABVD, respectively. In CHOP CS III/IV group, more patients had at least three risk factors (80%) than in ABVD CS III-IV group (40%). In contrast to ABVD, there were no deaths in CHOP group, but EFS was inferior. This might result from a higher risk level in CHOP patients. Toxicity of both regimens was mild: grade 3/4 leukopenia in 9%, grade 1/2/3 peripheral neuropathy in 6% of ABVD patients, and grade 3/4 neutropenia in 7% of CHOP patients. In conclusion, CHOP-21 is an active and low-toxic regimen in HL with risk factors. A prospective comparison of CHOP with a standard chemotherapy in a randomized study will be justified.

摘要

ABVD 仍然是霍奇金淋巴瘤(HL)的标准化疗方案,尽管有许多努力证明其他方案更具优势。博来霉素在该联合方案中具有一定的活性(J Clin Oncol 22:1532-3, 2004),但毒性显著增加。ABVD 的反应通常较慢,20-30%的复发率令人担忧。ABVD 从未与 CHOP 直接比较过,CHOP 是其他淋巴瘤的全球标准方案,其组成药物在 HL 中肯定是有效的。本研究是对我们 2004 年初始报告的更新(Blood 104, 2004)。除了延长随访时间外,我们还将未经治疗的患者的 CHOP 治疗结果与我们机构的 ABVD 治疗回顾性结果进行了比较。CHOP 和 ABVD 的 CR/CRu 率分别为 88%和 62%。在 CHOP CS III/IV 组中,至少有 3 个危险因素的患者比例(80%)高于 ABVD CS III-IV 组(40%)。与 ABVD 不同,CHOP 组无死亡病例,但 EFS 较差。这可能是由于 CHOP 患者的风险水平较高所致。两种方案的毒性均较轻:ABVD 患者中 3/4 级白细胞减少症发生率为 9%,1/2/3 级周围神经病发生率为 6%,CHOP 患者中 3/4 级中性粒细胞减少症发生率为 7%。总之,CHOP-21 是一种具有危险因素的 HL 有效且低毒的方案。在一项前瞻性随机研究中,将 CHOP 与标准化疗进行比较是合理的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验