Pediatric Department, Fatebenefratelli e Oftalmico Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2009 Nov;20(7):660-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2009.00860.x. Epub 2009 Mar 23.
Sublingual-specific immunotherapy (SLIT) is considered as a valid treatment of respiratory allergies. However, there are few data on large sample size regarding its clinical role in 'real life' in term of reduction of symptoms, rescue medications and prevention of asthma in patients suffering from allergic rhinitis (AR) especially in children. We performed a multicenter, case-control study to evaluate the effect of SLIT in children (age 6-18 yr) with intermittent or persistent AR. 171 children (27% girls and 73% boys) with AR due to seasonal or perennial allergens were enrolled in a multicenter case-control study. Cases (n = 90) were defined as patients with intermittent (64%) or persistent (36%) AR who were treated for at least two consecutive years with specific SLIT with the related allergen extracts (SLITone ALK-Abellò). Controls (n = 81) were defined as sex-age- and type of allergen matched AR children who were never treated with specific immunotherapy and had no asthmatic symptoms at the beginning of observation period. Main outcomes of the study were the rhinoconjunctivitis symptom score (SS) (sneezing, rhinorrea, nasal itch, congestion, ocular itch and watery eyes) with a ranging scale from 0 (=no symptoms) to 3 (=severe symptoms) and the medication score (MS) evaluating symptomatic drug intake (antihystamine and inhaled corticosteroids). SS and MS were evaluated at the end of the observational period in relation with the period, considering the last 12 months, in which patients suffered the highest symptoms levels (i.e., peak of relevant pollen season (seasonal AR) or during the period of maximum allergen exposure in case of perennial AR). Secondary outcome of the study was the development of asthma symptoms during the observation period. SS (mean +/- SD) was 4.5 +/- 2.5 in cases and 9.0 +/- 3.0 in controls (-50%) (p = 0.0001). MS (mean +/- SD) was 2.5 +/- 1.9 and 3.6 +/- 2.1 in the case and control groups, respectively (-31%) (p = 0.0001). At the end of the observation period asthma symptoms were present in 14 subjects in the case group (15%) and in 20 children (24%) in the control group (p = 0.13). New skin sensitizations appeared in 6% of cases (n = 2) and in 36% (n = 12) of the controls (p = 0.001). The EFESO trial shows that a 2-yr once daily SLIT treatment in children with intermittent or persistent AR is associated with lower symptom and medication scores in comparison with subjects treated with symptomatic drugs only.
舌下特异性免疫疗法(SLIT)被认为是治疗呼吸道过敏的有效方法。然而,关于其在“真实生活”中减少症状、急救药物和预防哮喘方面的临床作用,特别是在儿童患者中的大样本量数据很少。我们进行了一项多中心、病例对照研究,以评估 SLIT 在患有过敏性鼻炎(AR)的儿童(6-18 岁)中的临床疗效。171 名因季节性或常年性过敏原而患有 AR 的儿童(27%为女孩,73%为男孩)参加了这项多中心病例对照研究。病例组(n=90)被定义为间歇性(64%)或持续性(36%)AR 患者,他们接受了至少连续 2 年的特定 SLIT 治疗,使用相关过敏原提取物(SLITone ALK-Abellò)。对照组(n=81)被定义为性别、年龄和过敏原匹配的 AR 儿童,他们从未接受过特异性免疫治疗,在观察期开始时没有哮喘症状。该研究的主要结局是鼻结膜炎症状评分(SS)(打喷嚏、鼻漏、鼻痒、鼻塞、眼痒和流泪),范围从 0(=无症状)到 3(=严重症状),以及药物评分(MS),评估症状性药物摄入(抗组胺药和吸入性皮质类固醇)。在观察期末,根据患者出现最高症状水平的时间段(即相关花粉季节高峰(季节性 AR)或常年性 AR 期间最大过敏原暴露期)评估 SS 和 MS。该研究的次要结局是在观察期间发展为哮喘症状。病例组的 SS(平均值+/-标准差)为 4.5+/-2.5,对照组为 9.0+/-3.0(-50%)(p=0.0001)。病例组的 MS(平均值+/-标准差)为 2.5+/-1.9,对照组为 3.6+/-2.1(-31%)(p=0.0001)。在观察期末,病例组有 14 名(15%)和对照组有 20 名(24%)儿童(p=0.13)出现哮喘症状。新的皮肤致敏在 6%的病例(n=2)和 36%的对照组(n=12)中出现(p=0.001)。EFESO 试验表明,在间歇性或持续性 AR 儿童中,2 年每日一次 SLIT 治疗与仅接受对症药物治疗的患者相比,症状和药物评分更低。