Tian Jie, Xu Zhili, Smith Jeffrey S, Hofherr Sean E, Barry Michael A, Byrnes Andrew P
Division of Cellular and Gene Therapies, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
J Virol. 2009 Jun;83(11):5648-58. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00082-09. Epub 2009 Mar 25.
Understanding innate immunity is key to improving the safety of adenovirus (Ad) vectors for systemic gene therapy. Ad has been shown to activate complement in vitro, but activation of complement after Ad injection in vivo has not been directly measured. Using complement protein C3a as a marker of complement activation, we show that types 2 and 5 human Ads cause rapid complement activation after intravenous injection in mice. Unexpectedly, the mechanisms in vivo were different than those in vitro. Antibodies were critical for the activation of complement by Ad in vitro, but antibodies were not required in vivo. The classical pathway was required in vitro, whereas complement activation in vivo involved both classical and nonclassical pathways as well as the reticuloendothelial system. Remarkably, the entry-deficient Ad mutant ts1 was completely unable to activate complement in vivo even though it was fully able to activate complement in vitro. This result demonstrates that the complement system senses intravenously injected Ad primarily by detecting the effects of Ad on cells rather than through direct interaction of complement with virions. Encouragingly, shielding Ad with polyethylene glycol was effective at reducing complement activation both in vitro and in vivo. In summary, intravenously injected Ad rapidly activates complement through multiple pathways, but these pathways are different than those identified by in vitro studies. In vitro studies are poorly predictive of in vivo mechanisms because Ad virions activate complement through indirect mechanisms in vivo.
了解先天免疫是提高用于全身基因治疗的腺病毒(Ad)载体安全性的关键。已证明Ad在体外可激活补体,但尚未直接测量Ad在体内注射后补体的激活情况。使用补体蛋白C3a作为补体激活的标志物,我们发现2型和5型人Ad在小鼠静脉注射后会导致快速的补体激活。出乎意料的是,体内机制与体外机制不同。抗体在体外对Ad激活补体至关重要,但在体内则不需要抗体。体外需要经典途径,而体内补体激活涉及经典和非经典途径以及网状内皮系统。值得注意的是,进入缺陷型Ad突变体ts1即使在体外完全能够激活补体,在体内也完全无法激活补体。这一结果表明,补体系统主要通过检测Ad对细胞的影响而非通过补体与病毒粒子的直接相互作用来感知静脉注射的Ad。令人鼓舞的是,用聚乙二醇屏蔽Ad在体外和体内均能有效减少补体激活。总之,静脉注射的Ad通过多种途径快速激活补体,但这些途径与体外研究确定的途径不同。体外研究对体内机制的预测性较差,因为Ad病毒粒子在体内通过间接机制激活补体。