Griffiths Natalie A, Tank Jennifer L, Royer Todd V, Rosi-Marshall Emma J, Whiles Matt R, Chambers Catherine P, Frauendorf Therese C, Evans-White Michelle A
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556, USA.
Ecol Appl. 2009 Jan;19(1):133-42. doi: 10.1890/07-1876.1.
Headwater streams draining agricultural landscapes receive maize leaves (Zea mays L.) via wind and surface runoff, yet the contribution of maize detritus to organic-matter processing in agricultural streams is largely unknown. We quantified decomposition and microbial respiration rates on conventional (non-Bt) and genetically engineered (Bt) maize in three low-order agricultural streams in northwestern Indiana, USA. We also examined how substrate quality and in-stream nutrient concentrations influenced microbial respiration on maize by comparing respiration on maize and red maple leaves (Acer rubrum) in three nutrient-rich agricultural streams and three low-nutrient forested streams. We found significantly higher rates of microbial respiration on maize vs. red maple leaves and higher rates in agricultural vs. forested streams. Thus both the elevated nutrient status of agricultural streams and the lability of maize detritus (e.g., low carbon-to-nitrogen ratio and low lignin content) result in a rapid incorporation of maize leaves into the aquatic microbial food web. We found that Bt maize had a faster decomposition rate than non-Bt maize, while microbial respiration rates did not differ between Bt and non-Bt maize. Decomposition rates were not negatively affected by genetic engineering, perhaps because the Bt toxin does not adversely affect the aquatic microbial assemblage involved in maize decomposition. Additionally, shredding caddisflies, which are known to have suppressed growth rates when fed Bt maize, were depauperate in these agricultural streams, and likely did not play a major role in maize decomposition. Overall, the conversion of native vegetation to row-crop agriculture appears to have altered the quantity, quality, and predictability of allochthonous carbon inputs to headwater streams, with unexplored effects on stream ecosystem structure and function.
流经农业景观区域的源头溪流会通过风力和地表径流接收玉米叶片(玉米属),然而玉米碎屑对农业溪流中有机物分解的贡献在很大程度上尚不明确。我们在美国印第安纳州西北部的三条低阶农业溪流中,对常规(非转基因)玉米和转基因(Bt)玉米的分解速率及微生物呼吸速率进行了量化。我们还通过比较三条富营养农业溪流和三条低营养森林溪流中玉米和红枫树叶(红花槭)上的呼吸作用,研究了底物质量和溪流中养分浓度如何影响玉米上的微生物呼吸。我们发现,玉米上的微生物呼吸速率显著高于红枫树叶,且农业溪流中的速率高于森林溪流。因此,农业溪流中升高的养分状况以及玉米碎屑的易分解性(如低碳氮比和低木质素含量)导致玉米叶片迅速融入水生微生物食物网。我们发现,Bt玉米的分解速率比非Bt玉米更快,而Bt玉米和非Bt玉米之间的微生物呼吸速率没有差异。分解速率并未受到基因工程的负面影响,这可能是因为Bt毒素不会对参与玉米分解的水生微生物群落产生不利影响。此外,已知取食Bt玉米时生长速率会受到抑制的碎食性毛翅目幼虫,在这些农业溪流中数量稀少,可能在玉米分解过程中不起主要作用。总体而言,原生植被向行栽作物农业的转变似乎改变了源头溪流中异地碳输入的数量、质量和可预测性,对溪流生态系统结构和功能产生了尚未探究的影响。