Latimer Margot A, Johnston Celeste C, Ritchie Judith A, Clarke Sean P, Gilin Debra
Dalhousie University and IWK Health Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2009 Mar-Apr;38(2):182-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2009.01007.x.
To examine the effects of nurse, infant, and organizational factors on delivery of collaborative and evidence-based pain care by nurses.
Cross sectional.
Two Level III neonatal intensive care units in 2 large tertiary care centers in Canada.
A convenience sample of 93 nurses completed survey data on procedures they performed on ill neonates. The 93 nurses performed a total of 170 pain producing procedures on 2 different shifts.
Nurse use of evidence-based protocols to manage procedure related pain using a scorecard of nurses' assessment, management, and documentation.
Procedural pain care was more likely to meet evidence-based criteria when nurse participants rated nurse-physician collaboration higher (odds ratio, 1.44; 95% confidence intervals 1.05-1.98), cared for higher care intensity infants (odds ratio, 1.21; 95% confidence intervals, 1.06-1.39), and experienced unexpected increases in work assignments (odds ratio, 1.55; 95% confidence intervals, 1.04-2.30). Nurses' knowledge about the protocols, educational preparation and experience were not significant predictors of evidence-based care for the most common procedures: heel lance and intravenous initiation.
Nurse-physician collaboration and nurses' work assignments were more predictive of evidence-based care than infant and nurse factors. Nurses' knowledge regarding evidence-based care was not a predictor of implementation of protocols. In the final statistical modeling, collaboration with physicians, a variable amenable to intervention and further study, emerged as a strong predictor. The results highlight the complex issue of translating knowledge to practice, however, specific findings related to pain assessment and collaboration provide some direction for future practice and research initiatives.
探讨护士、婴儿及组织因素对护士提供协作性循证疼痛护理的影响。
横断面研究。
加拿大2家大型三级医疗中心的2个三级新生儿重症监护病房。
采用便利抽样法,93名护士完成了关于他们对患病新生儿实施的操作的调查数据。这93名护士在2个不同班次共实施了170项产生疼痛的操作。
护士使用循证方案管理与操作相关疼痛的情况,通过护士评估、管理及记录的记分卡进行评估。
当护士参与者对护士与医生协作的评分更高时(优势比为1.44;95%置信区间为1.05 - 1.98)、护理护理强度更高的婴儿时(优势比为1.21;95%置信区间为1.06 - 1.39)以及经历工作任务意外增加时(优势比为1.55;95%置信区间为1.04 - 2.30),程序性疼痛护理更有可能符合循证标准。对于最常见的操作(足跟采血和静脉穿刺),护士对方案的了解、教育背景和经验并非循证护理的显著预测因素。
护士与医生的协作及护士的工作任务比婴儿和护士因素更能预测循证护理。护士对循证护理的知识并非方案实施的预测因素。在最终的统计模型中,与医生的协作这一易于干预和进一步研究的变量成为强有力的预测因素。结果凸显了将知识转化为实践这一复杂问题,然而,与疼痛评估和协作相关的具体发现为未来实践和研究举措提供了一些方向。