Department of Psychology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.
Arch Sex Behav. 2010 Aug;39(4):915-25. doi: 10.1007/s10508-009-9492-8. Epub 2009 Mar 28.
Sexual identity has generally been studied with a focus on sexual orientation and has not incorporated a general identity framework. Low levels of identity exploration and commitment have been shown to predict poor well-being in adolescents, but the relationship between sexual identity and sexual well-being has not been examined. The current cross-sectional survey was administered to 293 heterosexual female undergraduate students from a mid-sized university in Ontario, Canada. Participants completed the Measure of Sexual Identity Exploration and Commitment (Worthington, Navarro, Savoy, & Hampton, 2008), as well as several measures to assess sexual well-being. These included the Sexuality Scale (Snell & Papini, 1989), the Sexual Awareness Questionnaire (Snell, Fisher, & Miller, 1991), the Body Esteem Scale for Adolescents and Adults (Mendelson, Mendelson, & White, 2001; Mendelson, White, & Mendelson, 1997), and four individual items assessing sexual satisfaction (Laumann et al., 2006). Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test the measurement models of sexual identity and sexual well-being, and structural equation modeling was used to examine the relationship between sexual identity and sexual well-being. Results indicated that higher levels of sexual identity exploration and commitment predicted sexual well-being. However, other aspects of sexual identity, such as synthesis and sexual orientation identity, were not predictive of sexual well-being. The implications of using an identity framework for measuring sexual identity are discussed.
性身份认同通常是在性取向的基础上进行研究的,并没有纳入一般的身份认同框架。研究表明,较低的身份认同探索和承诺水平会预测青少年的不良幸福感,但性身份认同与性幸福感之间的关系尚未得到检验。本横断面研究对加拿大安大略省一所中型大学的 293 名异性恋女性本科生进行了调查。参与者完成了性身份认同探索和承诺度量表(Worthington、Navarro、Savoy 和 Hampton,2008),以及一些评估性幸福感的测量工具。这些工具包括性量表(Snell 和 Papini,1989)、性意识问卷(Snell、Fisher 和 Miller,1991)、青少年和成人身体自尊量表(Mendelson、Mendelson 和 White,2001;Mendelson、White 和 Mendelson,1997),以及四个评估性满意度的单项(Laumann 等人,2006)。验证性因子分析用于检验性身份认同和性幸福感的测量模型,结构方程模型用于检验性身份认同与性幸福感之间的关系。结果表明,较高的性身份认同探索和承诺水平预测了性幸福感。然而,性身份认同的其他方面,如综合和性取向认同,对性幸福感没有预测作用。讨论了使用身份认同框架来衡量性身份认同的意义。