Suppr超能文献

儿童特应性哮喘与哮喘或特应性疾病总体患病率之间的关系:流行病学中的特应性哮喘和非特应性哮喘

Relationship between atopic asthma and the population prevalence rates for asthma or atopy in children: atopic and nonatopic asthma in epidemiology.

作者信息

Ronchetti Roberto, Jesenak Milos, Rennerova Zuzana, Barreto Mario, Ronchetti Francesco, Villa Maria P

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, 2nd School of Medicine, University "La Sapienza," Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Allergy Asthma Proc. 2009 Jan-Feb;30(1):55-63. doi: 10.2500/aap.2009.30.3197.

Abstract

Innumerable articles have tried to solve the "continuing enigma of atopic and nonatopic asthma" but notwithstanding the strenuous efforts to substantiate the few well-known clinico-epidemiologic differences between these two forms of asthma most studies have hitherto generated inconclusive statements. In a recent study based on the review of epidemiologic studies conducted worldwide in unselected populations of children, we documented that the prevalence of atopic asthma (AA) was high in the populations with a high prevalence of atopy. We systematically reviewed 36 articles that studied 48 populations of unselected children and reported prevalence rates for asthma and atopy in the total sample and in the subpopulations. No significant difference was found in the prevalence of asthma cases in the quartiles of childhood populations subdivided for the prevalence of atopy. In addition, atopy did not increase significantly in the subgroups of populations subdivided by asthma quartiles. In both subgroups, however, AA increased with increasing atopy or with increasing asthma (p < 0.001). Using a positive skin-prick test reaction to define cases of asthma as cases of AA is misleading because the prevalence of subjects so defined is heavily influenced by the environmentally generated changes in the prevalence of atopy or asthma. Asthma in a child should be labeled as a case of AA only if skin-prick tests yield a positive reaction and the clinical history documents asthma symptoms triggered by allergen exposure.

摘要

无数文章试图解开“特应性和非特应性哮喘的持续谜团”,但尽管人们付出了巨大努力来证实这两种哮喘形式之间少数广为人知的临床流行病学差异,但迄今为止,大多数研究得出的结论都不明确。在最近一项基于对全球未选定儿童人群进行的流行病学研究综述的研究中,我们记录到在特应性患病率高的人群中,特应性哮喘(AA)的患病率也很高。我们系统地回顾了36篇研究48个未选定儿童人群的文章,这些文章报告了总样本以及亚人群中哮喘和特应性的患病率。在根据特应性患病率划分的儿童人群四分位数中,哮喘病例的患病率没有发现显著差异。此外,在根据哮喘四分位数划分的人群亚组中,特应性也没有显著增加。然而,在这两个亚组中,AA都随着特应性增加或哮喘增加而增加(p < 0.001)。用阳性皮肤点刺试验反应将哮喘病例定义为AA病例具有误导性,因为如此定义的受试者患病率受到环境导致的特应性或哮喘患病率变化的严重影响。只有当皮肤点刺试验产生阳性反应且临床病史记录有过敏原暴露引发的哮喘症状时,儿童哮喘才应被标记为AA病例。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验