• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

作为移植桥梁的连续流左心室辅助装置植入后的年龄与预后

Age and outcome after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation as bridge to transplantation.

作者信息

Sandner Sigrid E, Zimpfer Daniel, Zrunek Philipp, Rajek Angela, Schima Heinrich, Dunkler Daniela, Zuckermann Andreas O, Wieselthaler Georg M

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

J Heart Lung Transplant. 2009 Apr;28(4):367-72. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2009.01.008.

DOI:10.1016/j.healun.2009.01.008
PMID:19332264
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The effect of age on outcomes after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation as a bridge to transplantation (BTT) was determined.

METHODS

From November 1998 to July 2007, 86 patients with advanced heart failure underwent continuous-flow LVAD implantation as BTT and were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were categorized into 2 groups by age at LVAD implantation: 56 patients (65.1%) younger than 60, Group 1; and 30 (34.9%) aged 60 years or older, Group 2.

RESULTS

Group 2 patients had a higher incidence of heart failure caused by ischemic heart disease (63.3% vs 32.1%, p = 0.005) and more severely impaired renal function by Modification of Diet in Renal Disease-derived glomerular filtration rates (51.9 +/- 15.9 vs. 68.0 +/- 20.5 ml/min/1.73 m(2), p < 0.001) than Group 1. Age was the only independent predictor of post-LVAD death (hazard ratio, 1.4 p = 0.003). The BTT rate was lower (33.3% vs 62.5%, p = 0.010), and incidence of post-LVAD renal failure was higher (53.3% vs 30.4%, p = 0.037) in Group 2 vs Group 1. Post-LVAD survival at 1, 3, and 6 months was 92.9%, 79.9%, and 74.0% for Group 1 and 90.0%, 62.0%, and 37.0% for Group 2 (p = 0.007). Post-transplant survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 87.8%, 82.3%, and 76.0% for Group 1 and 90.0%, 67.5%, 67.5% for Group 2 (p = 0.517).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients aged 60 years and older have inferior post-LVAD survival; however, post-transplant survival is excellent. We advocate LVAD placement as bridge-to-transplant therapy only in carefully selected older patients most well suited for transplantation.

摘要

目的

确定年龄对作为移植桥梁(BTT)的连续流左心室辅助装置(LVAD)植入术后结局的影响。

方法

1998年11月至2007年7月,86例晚期心力衰竭患者接受了作为BTT的连续流LVAD植入,并进行回顾性分析。根据LVAD植入时的年龄将患者分为两组:56例(65.1%)年龄小于60岁为第1组;30例(34.9%)年龄60岁及以上为第2组。

结果

第2组患者缺血性心脏病导致心力衰竭的发生率较高(63.3%对32.1%,p = 0.005),且根据肾脏病膳食改良法得出的肾小球滤过率显示肾功能损害更严重(51.9±15.9对68.0±20.5 ml/min/1.73 m²,p < 0.001)。年龄是LVAD植入术后死亡的唯一独立预测因素(风险比,1.4,p = 0.003)。第2组的BTT率较低(33.3%对62.5%,p = 0.010),LVAD植入术后肾衰竭的发生率较高(53.3%对30.4%,p = 0.037)。第1组LVAD植入术后1、3和6个月的生存率分别为92.9%、79.9%和74.0%,第2组分别为90.0%、62.0%和37.0%(p = 0.007)。第1组移植后1、3和5年的生存率分别为87.8%、82.3%和76.0%,第2组分别为90.0%、67.5%、67.5%(p = 0.517)。

结论

60岁及以上患者LVAD植入术后生存率较差;然而,移植后生存率良好。我们主张仅在经过精心挑选且最适合移植的老年患者中进行LVAD作为移植桥梁的治疗。

相似文献

1
Age and outcome after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation as bridge to transplantation.作为移植桥梁的连续流左心室辅助装置植入后的年龄与预后
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2009 Apr;28(4):367-72. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2009.01.008.
2
Renal function and outcome after continuous flow left ventricular assist device implantation.连续血流左心室辅助装置植入后的肾功能与预后
Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Apr;87(4):1072-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.01.022.
3
Predictors and outcomes of continuous veno-venous hemodialysis use after implantation of a left ventricular assist device.左心室辅助装置植入后持续静脉-静脉血液透析的预测因素及结果
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2006 Apr;25(4):404-8. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2005.11.457. Epub 2006 Feb 28.
4
Post-cardiac transplant survival after support with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: impact of duration of left ventricular assist device support and other variables.心脏移植后使用持续血流左心室辅助装置的生存情况:左心室辅助装置支持时间和其他变量的影响。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Jul;140(1):174-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.03.037. Epub 2010 May 5.
5
Right heart failure after left ventricular assist device implantation in patients with chronic congestive heart failure.慢性充血性心力衰竭患者植入左心室辅助装置后发生的右心衰竭。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2006 Jan;25(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2005.07.008. Epub 2005 Dec 9.
6
Improved survival and decreasing incidence of adverse events with the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device as bridge-to-transplant therapy.使用HeartMate II左心室辅助装置作为桥接至移植治疗可提高生存率并降低不良事件发生率。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Oct;86(4):1227-34; discussion 1234-5. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.06.030.
7
Renal function after implantation of continuous versus pulsatile flow left ventricular assist devices.连续流与搏动流左心室辅助装置植入后的肾功能
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2008 May;27(5):469-73. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2007.12.012.
8
Right heart failure and "failure to thrive" after left ventricular assist device: clinical predictors and outcomes.左心室辅助装置后右心衰竭和“生长不良”:临床预测因素和结局。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2011 Aug;30(8):888-95. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2011.03.006. Epub 2011 Apr 29.
9
Does continuous flow left ventricular assist device technology have a positive impact on outcome pretransplant and posttransplant?持续血流左心室辅助装置技术对移植前和移植后的结果有积极影响吗?
Ann Thorac Surg. 2006 Nov;82(5):1774-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.05.079.
10
Body mass index and outcomes after left ventricular assist device placement.体重指数与左心室辅助装置植入后的预后
Ann Thorac Surg. 2005 Jan;79(1):66-73. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.06.047.

引用本文的文献

1
Change in Caregiver Health-Related Quality of Life From Before to Early After Surgery: SUSTAIN-IT Study.手术前后照料者健康相关生活质量的变化:SUSTAIN-IT 研究。
Circ Heart Fail. 2023 Aug;16(8):e010038. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.122.010038. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
2
Health-Related Quality of Life in Older Patients With Heart Failure From Before to Early After Advanced Surgical Therapies: Findings From the SUSTAIN-IT Study.老年心力衰竭患者接受高级外科治疗前后的健康相关生活质量:来自 SUSTAIN-IT 研究的结果。
Circ Heart Fail. 2022 Oct;15(10):e009579. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.122.009579. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
3
Derivation and validation of the bridge to transplantation with left ventricular assist device score for 1 year mortality after heart transplantation. The BTT-LVAD score.
心脏移植后 1 年死亡率的桥接至移植左心室辅助装置评分的推导和验证。BTT-LVAD 评分。
Int J Artif Organs. 2022 May;45(5):470-477. doi: 10.1177/03913988221082690. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
4
Use of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation as Bridge to Replacement Therapies in Cardiogenic Shock: Insights From the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization.体外膜肺氧合在心源休克患者中作为桥接治疗的应用:来自体外生命支持组织的见解。
Circ Heart Fail. 2022 Jan;15(1):e008777. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.121.008777. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
5
Utilization of Left Ventricular Assist Device for Congestive Heart Failure: Inputs on Demographic and Hospital Characterization From Nationwide Inpatient Sample.左心室辅助装置在充血性心力衰竭中的应用:来自全国住院患者样本的人口统计学和医院特征数据
Cureus. 2021 Jul 1;13(7):e16094. doi: 10.7759/cureus.16094. eCollection 2021 Jul.
6
The impact of socioeconomic status in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs).左心室辅助装置(LVAD)患者的社会经济地位的影响。
J Card Surg. 2021 Oct;36(10):3501-3508. doi: 10.1111/jocs.15794. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
7
Contemporary outcomes of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices-a systematic review.连续流左心室辅助装置的当代结局——一项系统评价
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Mar;10(2):186-208. doi: 10.21037/acs-2021-cfmcs-35.
8
Role of imaging in diagnosis and management of left ventricular assist device complications.影像学在左心室辅助装置并发症诊断与管理中的作用
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Jul;35(7):1365-1377. doi: 10.1007/s10554-019-01562-4. Epub 2019 Mar 4.
9
Successful establishment of a left ventricular assist device program in an emerging country: one year experience.在一个新兴国家成功建立左心室辅助装置项目:一年经验
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Jun;10(Suppl 15):S1743-S1750. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.04.147.
10
Predictors of 30-day post-transplant mortality in patients bridged to transplantation with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices--An analysis of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Transplant Registry.使用连续流左心室辅助装置过渡到移植的患者移植后30天死亡率的预测因素——国际心肺移植学会移植登记处的分析
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2016 Jan;35(1):34-39. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2015.07.007. Epub 2015 Jul 29.