Maisenbacher Herbert W, Estrada Amara H, Prosek Robert, Shih Andre C, Vangilder James M
Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.
Am J Vet Res. 2009 Apr;70(4):455-63. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.70.4.455.
OBJECTIVE-To compare the acute effects of cardiac pacing from various transvenous pacing sites on left ventricular (LV) function and synchrony in clinically normal dogs. ANIMALS-10 healthy adult mixed-breed dogs. PROCEDURES-Dogs were anesthetized, and dual-chamber transvenous biventricular pacing systems were implanted. Dogs were paced in single-chamber mode from the right atrial appendage (RAA) alone and in dual-chamber mode from the right ventricular apex (RVA), from the left ventricular free wall (LVFW), and simultaneously from the RVA and LVFW (BiV). Standard ECG and echocardiographic measurements, cardiac output measured with the lithium dilution method (LiDCO), and tissue Doppler-derived measurements of LV synchrony were obtained during each of the pacing configurations. RESULTS-Placement of the biventricular pacing systems was possible in 8 of the 10 dogs. The QRS duration was significantly different among all pacing sites, and the order of increasing duration was RAA, BiV, LVFW, and RVA. Pacing sites did not differ with respect to fractional shortening; however, pacing from the RVA resulted in a significantly lower ejection fraction than pacing from all other sites. During RVA and LVFW pacing, LiDCO was significantly lower than that at other sites; there was no significant difference between RAA and BiV pacing with respect to LiDCO. Although the degree of dyssynchrony was significantly lower during pacing from the RAA versus other ventricular pacing sites, it was not significantly different among sites. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE-Ventricular activation by RAA pacing provided the best LV function and synchrony. Pacing from the RVA worsened LV function, and although pacing from the LVFW improved it, BiV pacing may provide additional improvement.
目的——比较临床上正常犬经静脉在不同起搏部位进行心脏起搏对左心室(LV)功能和同步性的急性影响。
动物——10只健康成年杂种犬。
步骤——对犬实施麻醉,植入双腔经静脉双心室起搏系统。犬分别以单腔模式从右心耳(RAA)起搏,以及以双腔模式从右心室心尖(RVA)、左心室游离壁(LVFW)起搏,并同时从RVA和LVFW(双心室起搏,BiV)起搏。在每种起搏配置期间,获取标准心电图和超声心动图测量值、用锂稀释法(LiDCO)测量的心输出量,以及组织多普勒测量的LV同步性。
结果——10只犬中有8只成功植入双心室起搏系统。所有起搏部位的QRS波时限存在显著差异,时限增加顺序为RAA、BiV、LVFW和RVA。起搏部位在缩短分数方面无差异;然而,与从所有其他部位起搏相比,从RVA起搏导致射血分数显著降低。在RVA和LVFW起搏期间,LiDCO显著低于其他部位;RAA和BiV起搏在LiDCO方面无显著差异。尽管与其他心室起搏部位相比,从RAA起搏时不同步程度显著更低,但各部位之间无显著差异。
结论及临床意义——RAA起搏引起的心室激动可提供最佳的LV功能和同步性。从RVA起搏会使LV功能恶化,虽然从LVFW起搏可改善LV功能,但双心室起搏可能会带来进一步改善。