Suppr超能文献

在皮肤活检中评估表皮内神经纤维密度时,三位观察者之间存在显著差异。

Significant difference between three observers in the assessment of intraepidermal nerve fiber density in skin biopsy.

作者信息

Wöpking Sigrid, Scherens Andrea, Haussleiter Ida S, Richter Helmut, Schüning Julia, Klauenberg Sabrina, Maier Christoph

机构信息

Department of Pain Management, Ruhr-University Bochum, BG-Kliniken Bergmannsheil, Bürkle-de-la-Camp-Platz 1, D-44789 Bochum, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Neurol. 2009 Mar 31;9:13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-9-13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The determination of Intraepidermal Nerve Fiber Density (IENFD) in skin biopsy is a useful method for the evaluation of different types of peripheral neuropathies. To allow a reliable use of the method it is necessary to determine interobserver reliability. Previous studies dealing with this topic used limited suitable statistical methods.

METHODS

In the present study three observers determined the IENFD and estimated the staining quality of the basement membrane for an adequate quantity of 120 skin biopsies (stained with indirect immunofluorescence technique) from 68 patients. More adequate statistical methods like intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland Altman Plot were chosen to estimate interobserver reliability.

RESULTS

We found an unexpected significant difference in IENFD between the observers (p < 0.05) and so the results of this study are not in line with the high interobserver reliability reported before (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.73). The Bland Altmann Plot showed a variance growing with rising mean. The difference in IENFD between the observers and the resulting low interobserver reliability is likely caused by different interpretations of the standard counting rules. There was no significant difference in IENFD between observers for biopsies with a well-defined basement membrane. Thus skin biopsies with an inexactly defined basement membrane should not be used diagnostically for the determination of IENFD.

CONCLUSION

These results emphasise that standardisation of the method is extremely important and at least two observers should analyse skin biopsies with critical IENFD near the cut-off values.

摘要

背景

皮肤活检中表皮内神经纤维密度(IENFD)的测定是评估不同类型周围神经病的一种有用方法。为了可靠地使用该方法,有必要确定观察者间的可靠性。以往涉及该主题的研究使用的统计方法有限且不够合适。

方法

在本研究中,三名观察者对来自68例患者的120份皮肤活检标本(采用间接免疫荧光技术染色)测定IENFD,并评估基底膜的染色质量。选择了更合适的统计方法,如实内相关系数和Bland Altman图,来评估观察者间的可靠性。

结果

我们发现观察者之间的IENFD存在意外的显著差异(p < 0.05),因此本研究结果与之前报道的高观察者间可靠性(组内相关系数:0.73)不一致。Bland Altman图显示方差随均值升高而增大。观察者之间IENFD的差异以及由此导致的低观察者间可靠性可能是由于对标准计数规则的不同解读所致。对于基底膜明确的活检标本,观察者之间的IENFD没有显著差异。因此,基底膜定义不明确的皮肤活检标本不应用于IENFD测定的诊断。

结论

这些结果强调该方法的标准化极其重要,并且至少应有两名观察者分析IENFD临界值接近截断值的皮肤活检标本。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f69/2672925/6f0c5d312f6c/1471-2377-9-13-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验