Suppr超能文献

评估多种估计方法和不同海洋生物群落的物种 - 面积关系的准确性和精确性。

Evaluating accuracy and precision of species-area relationships for multiple estimators and different marine assemblages.

作者信息

Chapman M G, Underwood A J

机构信息

Centre for Research on Ecological Impacts of Coastal Cities, Marine Ecology A11, University of Sydney, New South Wales, 2006 Australia.

出版信息

Ecology. 2009 Mar;90(3):754-66. doi: 10.1890/08-0650.1.

Abstract

This paper evaluates the accuracy and precision of six nonparametric estimators and six regression models for predicting the number of species in an area using random subsamples of that area. Such extrapolations are important for increased understanding of species-area relationships in different assemblages of species to inform ecological theories, and because they have direct implications in many conservation issues. Often, such extrapolations are evaluated by considering how well they fit existing data, rather than the actual number of species in the larger area. Also, many studies have focused on larger species in terrestrial habitats, where numbers of species are quite well known. Assemblages of invertebrates and smaller plants, especially in marine habitats, are less well known, and their distributions are dominated by small-scale variability. We examined species-area relations for two assemblages on boulders from six locations, for rocky shore assemblages in three locations, and for gastropods colonizing artificial habitat. Changing the focus of subsampling relative to the extent of the study and changing the size of the subsamples was also evaluated for subsets of data. Most estimators fitted the number of species poorly, with the second-order Jackknife consistently the best of the nonparametric measures, and the Negative Exponential the best of the regression models. Increasing the number of replicates improved most models, but some only slightly, and others considerably. Changing focus had little effect, probably because marine assemblages such as these vary at small scales as much as at many larger scales. These extensive analyses provide clear evidence about which estimators should not be used for measuring species-area relationships in assemblages such as these, and which will consistently over- or underestimate the number of species. The findings are applicable to many assemblages dominated by small organisms with strong stochastic variation.

摘要

本文评估了六种非参数估计器和六种回归模型在使用某区域的随机子样本预测该区域物种数量时的准确性和精确性。此类外推对于增进对不同物种组合中物种 - 面积关系的理解以完善生态理论很重要,并且因为它们在许多保护问题中具有直接影响。通常,此类外推是通过考虑它们与现有数据的拟合程度来评估的,而非较大区域中实际的物种数量。此外,许多研究聚焦于陆地栖息地中的大型物种,其物种数量是相当清楚的。无脊椎动物和较小植物的组合,尤其是在海洋栖息地中的,了解较少,并且它们的分布受小尺度变异性主导。我们研究了来自六个地点的巨石上的两种组合、三个地点的岩岸组合以及定殖于人工栖息地的腹足类动物的物种 - 面积关系。对于数据子集,还评估了相对于研究范围改变子采样的重点以及改变子样本大小的情况。大多数估计器对物种数量的拟合较差,二阶刀切法在非参数度量中始终是最佳的,负指数模型在回归模型中是最佳的。增加重复次数改进了大多数模型,但有些改进很小,而有些则相当大。改变重点影响不大,可能是因为像这样的海洋组合在小尺度上的变化与在许多较大尺度上的变化一样大。这些广泛的分析提供了明确的证据,表明哪些估计器不应用于测量此类组合中的物种 - 面积关系,以及哪些会始终高估或低估物种数量。这些发现适用于许多由具有强烈随机变化的小型生物主导的组合。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验