Saz-Parkinson Zuleika, López-Cuadrado Teresa, Bouza Carmen, Amate José-María
Agencia de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo, Madrid, Spain.
BioDrugs. 2009;23(1):37-42. doi: 10.2165/00063030-200923010-00004.
Human follicle-stimulating hormone (hFSH; follitropin alfa) can be employed therapeutically to induce ovarian follicular development in assisted reproduction treatments. Current recombinant hFSH (r-hFSH) preparations available for clinical use are labeled either in terms of the bioactivity expressed in international units (IU) or in mass (microg). Several clinical trials have tried to assess the clinical implications of the physicochemical improvements in the dosing of follitropin alfa filled by mass (FbM). The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis of previous studies in order to assess the efficacy and safety of ovarian stimulation using follitropin alfa FbM compared with follitropin alfa filled by international units (FbIU).
A literature search was carried out in scientific databases to find published articles and abstracts comparing both hormone preparations. A fixed effects model meta-analysis was performed. The variables studied include the average dose (IU), days of treatment, estradiol peak, follicles >14 mm, number of extracted oocytes, number of embryos obtained, number of cases of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), and clinical pregnancies.
A total of six studies met the stated criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. In these studies, the average r-hFSH dose per patient was 230.29 IU less with administration of follitropin alfa FbM compared with FbIU, and the number of days of treatment was reduced by 0.48. In addition, a significantly greater number of oocytes (0.84) were extracted, more embryos (0.88) were obtained, and a higher peak level of estradiol (613.08 pmol/L) was achieved in the patients undergoing ovarian stimulation with follitropin alfa FbM. However, no statistically significant differences were observed in the number of follicles >14 mm, clinical pregnancies, or OHSS cases.
Follitropin alfa FbM, a technologically modified formulation of r-hFSH, is as safe as follitropin alfa FbIU but requires a smaller dose over a shorter period to produce more oocytes and final embryos.
人促卵泡生成素(hFSH;重组促卵泡素α)可用于辅助生殖治疗中诱导卵巢卵泡发育。目前临床可用的重组hFSH(r-hFSH)制剂的标签标注方式有两种,一种是以国际单位(IU)表示的生物活性,另一种是以质量(μg)表示。多项临床试验试图评估按质量填充的重组促卵泡素α(FbM)给药时理化性质改善的临床意义。本研究的目的是对既往研究进行荟萃分析,以评估与按国际单位填充的重组促卵泡素α(FbIU)相比,使用FbM进行卵巢刺激的有效性和安全性。
在科学数据库中进行文献检索,以查找比较这两种激素制剂的已发表文章和摘要。进行固定效应模型荟萃分析。研究的变量包括平均剂量(IU)、治疗天数、雌二醇峰值、直径>14mm的卵泡数量、取出的卵母细胞数量、获得的胚胎数量、卵巢过度刺激综合征(OHSS)病例数和临床妊娠数。
共有六项研究符合既定标准并纳入荟萃分析。在这些研究中,与FbIU相比,使用FbM的患者每人的r-hFSH平均剂量少230.29IU,治疗天数减少0.48天。此外,接受FbM卵巢刺激的患者取出的卵母细胞显著更多(多0.84个),获得的胚胎更多(多0.88个),雌二醇峰值更高(613.08pmol/L)。然而,直径>14mm的卵泡数量、临床妊娠数或OHSS病例数未观察到统计学上的显著差异。
FbM是一种经过技术改良的r-hFSH制剂,与FbIU一样安全,但在更短的时间内需要更小的剂量就能产生更多的卵母细胞和最终胚胎。