Blasco-Costa Isabel, Balbuena Juan A, Kostadinova Aneta, Olson Peter D
Marine Zoology Unit, Cavanilles Institute of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology, University of Valencia, PO Box 22085, 46071 Valencia, Spain.
Parasitol Int. 2009 Sep;58(3):263-9. doi: 10.1016/j.parint.2009.03.006. Epub 2009 Apr 5.
The taxonomic framework of the Haploporidae is evaluated and the relationships within the Haploporinae are assessed for the first time at the generic level using molecular data. Partial 28S and complete ITS2 rDNA sequences from representatives of six of the nine recognised genera within the Haploporinae were analysed together with published sequences representing members of two haploporid subfamilies and of the closely related family Atractotrematidae. Molecular analyses revealed: (i) a close relationship between the Atractotrematidae and the Haploporidae; (ii) strong support for the monophyly of the Haploporinae, Dicrogaster and Saccocoelium, and the position of Ragaia within the Haploporinae; (iii) evidence for rejection of the synonymy of Saccocoelioides and Lecithobotrys and the validity of the Dicrogasterinae; and (iv) support for the distinct status of Saccocoelium in relation to Haploporus. The wider sampling within the genera Dicrogaster and Saccocoelium confirmed the distinct status of the included species, thus rejecting previously suggested synonymies. Saccocoelioides, recently transferred to the Chalcinotrematinae, was nested within the Haploporinae and this was largely associated with the position of Forticulcita, resolved as the most basal haploporine genus. Forticulcita also possesses a well-delimited eversible intromittent copulatory organ, a feature unique in the Haploporidae which has not been previously considered an important apomorphy. This, in association with the present hypothesis of the Haploporinae based on molecular data, led us to erect Forticulcitinae subf. n. for Forticulcita; this resolved Saccocoelioides and, by extension the Chalcinotrematinae, as sister groups to the Haploporinae.
首次利用分子数据在属级水平上评估了单孔科的分类框架,并评估了单孔亚科内的亲缘关系。分析了单孔亚科九个公认属中六个属的代表的部分28S和完整ITS2 rDNA序列,以及代表两个单孔科亚科和密切相关的棘口科成员的已发表序列。分子分析表明:(i) 棘口科与单孔科之间存在密切关系;(ii) 强烈支持单孔亚科、双盘吸虫属和囊腔吸虫属的单系性,以及拉盖亚属在单孔亚科中的位置;(iii) 有证据拒绝将拟囊腔吸虫属和卵磷脂虫属视为同义词,以及双盘亚科的有效性;(iv) 支持囊腔吸虫属相对于单孔吸虫属的独特地位。在双盘吸虫属和囊腔吸虫属内进行的更广泛采样证实了所包含物种的独特地位,从而否定了先前提出的同义词关系。最近被转移到钙盘吸虫亚科的拟囊腔吸虫属嵌套在单孔亚科内,这在很大程度上与Forticulcita的位置有关,Forticulcita被确定为最基部的单孔亚科属。Forticulcita还具有一个界限分明的可外翻的插入式交配器官,这是单孔科中独一无二的特征,以前未被视为重要的衍征。这与基于分子数据的单孔亚科当前假说相结合,促使我们为Forticulcita建立新的Forticulcitinae亚科。这使得拟囊腔吸虫属以及由此延伸的钙盘吸虫亚科成为单孔亚科的姐妹群。