Terakawa Tomoaki, Miyake Hideaki, Kurahashi Toshifumi, Furukawa Junya, Takenaka Atsushi, Fujisawa Masato
Division of Urology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
BJU Int. 2009 Apr;103(8):1074-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2008.08322.x.
To compare the usefulness between real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) with that of conventional RT-PCR for detecting micrometastases in pelvic lymph nodes (PLN) dissected during radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer.
In all, 120 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer who underwent RP and pelvic lymphadenectomy were included. Expression of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) in 2215 PLNs obtained from these 120 patients were assessed by fully quantitative real-time RT-PCR and as well as conventional RT-PCR. Specimens, in which either PSA or PSMA mRNA was positive, were regarded as showing the 'presence of micrometastasis'.
Pathological examinations detected tumour cells in 29 PLNs from 11 patients, while real-time RT-PCR and conventional RT-PCR further identified micrometastasis in 143 and 81 PLNs from 32 and 19 patients, respectively, with no pathological evidence of nodal involvement; that is, the sensitivity of real-time RT-PCR for detecting micrometastases was significantly higher than that of conventional RT-PCR. In this series, biochemical recurrence occurred in 32 patients, and in both assays, there were significant differences in biochemical recurrence-free survival between patients with and with no micrometastases. However, despite the significant association of micrometastases detected by both assays with biochemical recurrence on univariate analysis, the presence of micrometastases detected by real-time RT-PCR but not that detected by conventional RT-PCR appeared to be useful as an independent predictor on multivariate analysis.
Although micrometastatic tumour foci in PLNs that were missed by routine pathological examination could be diagnosed by both real-time RT-PCR and conventional RT-PCR assays, it would be strongly recommended to use real-time RT-PCR to detect micrometastases considering its high sensitivity and the close association between the outcome of this assay and the probability of biochemical recurrence.
比较实时逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)与传统RT-PCR在检测前列腺癌根治术(RP)中所切除盆腔淋巴结(PLN)微转移灶方面的效用。
共纳入120例接受RP及盆腔淋巴结清扫术的临床局限性前列腺癌患者。通过全定量实时RT-PCR以及传统RT-PCR评估从这120例患者获取的2215个PLN中前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)和前列腺特异性膜抗原(PSMA)的表达。PSA或PSMA mRNA呈阳性的标本被视为显示“存在微转移”。
病理检查在11例患者的29个PLN中检测到肿瘤细胞,而实时RT-PCR和传统RT-PCR分别在32例和19例患者的143个和81个PLN中进一步鉴定出微转移,这些PLN无淋巴结受累的病理证据;也就是说,实时RT-PCR检测微转移灶的灵敏度显著高于传统RT-PCR。在本系列中,32例患者出现生化复发,在两种检测方法中,有微转移和无微转移的患者在无生化复发生存期方面均存在显著差异。然而,尽管单因素分析显示两种检测方法检测到的微转移均与生化复发显著相关,但多因素分析表明,实时RT-PCR检测到的微转移灶的存在似乎是一个独立的预测指标,而传统RT-PCR检测到的微转移灶则不然。
尽管常规病理检查遗漏的PLN中的微转移肿瘤灶可通过实时RT-PCR和传统RT-PCR检测出来,但鉴于实时RT-PCR的高灵敏度以及该检测结果与生化复发概率之间的密切关联,强烈建议使用实时RT-PCR来检测微转移。