Morris Aimee M, Anderson Oren P, Finke Richard G
Department of Chemistry, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, USA.
Inorg Chem. 2009 May 18;48(10):4411-20. doi: 10.1021/ic9000363.
A 1997 Nature paper (Nature 1997, 388, 353-355) and subsequent 1998 J. Am. Chem. Soc. paper (J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 11969-11976) reported that a putative Ru(2)-substituted polyoxoanion, "WZnRu(2)(III)(H(2)O)(OH)(ZnW(9)O(34))(2)", (1), is an all inorganic dioxygenase able to incorporate one O(2) into two adamantane CH bonds to yield 2 equiv of 1-adamantanol as the primary product. In a subsequent 2005 Inorg. Chem. publication (Inorg. Chem. 2005, 44, 4175-4188), strong evidence was provided that the putative dioxygenase chemistry is, instead, the result of classic autoxidation catalysis. That research raised the question of whether the reported Ru(2) precatalyst, 1, was pure or even if it contained two Ru atoms, since Ru is known to be difficult to substitute into polyoxoanion structures (Nomiya, K.; Torii, H.; Nomura, K.; Sato, Y. J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 2001, 1506-1521). After our research group had contact with three other groups who also had difficulties reproducing the reported synthesis and composition of 1, we decided to re-examine 1 in some detail. Herein we provide evidence that the claimed 1 actually appears to be the parent polyoxoanion WZn(3)(H(2)O)(2)(ZnW(9)O(34))(2) with small amounts of Ru (</=0.2 atoms) either substituted into the parent complex or present as a small amount of a Ru(n+) impurity, at least in our and two other group's hands. The evidence obtained, on three independent samples prepared from two research groups including ours, includes elemental analysis on the bulk samples, single crystal X-ray diffraction, elemental analysis on single crystals from the same batch used for X-ray diffraction, (183)W NMR, and adamantane oxidation oxygen uptake and product determination studies. Also re-examined herein are the two previously reported crystal structures of 1 that appear to be very similar to the structure of the parent polyoxoanion, WZn(3)(H(2)O)(2)(ZnW(9)O(34))(2). Furthermore, we report that trace Ru alone, in the form of [Ru(DMSO)(4)Cl(2)], or that the parent polyoxoanion WZn(3)(H(2)O)(2)(ZnW(9)O(34))(2) alone, are capable of producing the same products. More significantly, a simple physical mixture of WZn(3)(H(2)O)(2)(ZnW(9)O(34))(2) plus the average 0.13 equiv of Ru found by analysis added as the [Ru(DMSO)(4)Cl(2)] starting material is a ca. 2-fold kinetically more competent catalyst than is "WZnRu(2)(III)(H(2)O)(OH)(ZnW(9)O(34))(2)", (1). In short, the evidence is strong that the putative "WZnRu(2)(III)(H(2)O)(OH)(ZnW(9)O(34))(2)", (1), which underlies the previously reported all-inorganic dioxygenase catalysis claim, is probably not correct. That does not mean that 1 cannot or even does not exist, but just that (a) no reliable synthesis of it exists if it has actually been made before, and (b) that a simple mixture of the [Ru(DMSO)(4)Cl(2)] plus WZn(3)(H(2)O)(2)(ZnW(9)O(34))(2) precursors gives about 2-fold faster catalysis of adamantane hydroxylation that occurs by, the evidence suggests, a radical-chain autoxidation mechanism rather than via the previously claimed, novel all-inorganic-based dioxygenase catalysis.
1997年发表于《自然》杂志的一篇论文(《自然》,1997年,第388卷,第353 - 355页)以及随后1998年发表于《美国化学会志》的论文(《美国化学会志》,1998年,第120卷,第11969 - 11976页)报道,一种假定的钌(II)取代的多金属氧酸盐“WZnRu₂(III)(H₂O)(OH)(ZnW₉O₃₄)₂”,(1),是一种全无机双加氧酶,能够将一个O₂引入两个金刚烷的C - H键中,生成2当量的1 - 金刚烷醇作为主要产物。在随后2005年发表于《无机化学》杂志的一篇论文(《无机化学》,2005年,第44卷,第4175 - 4188页)中,有力证据表明,这种假定的双加氧酶化学过程实际上是经典自氧化催化作用的结果。该研究提出了一个问题,即所报道的钌(II)预催化剂1是否纯净,甚至它是否含有两个钌原子,因为已知钌很难取代进入多金属氧酸盐结构中(野宫,K.; 鸟居,H.; 野村,K.; 佐藤,Y. 《化学会志 - 道尔顿汇刊》,2001年,第1506 - 1521页)。在我们研究小组与另外三个也难以重复所报道的1的合成及组成的小组取得联系后,我们决定对1进行更详细的重新研究。在此,我们提供证据表明,所声称的1实际上似乎是母体多金属氧酸盐WZn₃(H₂O)₂(ZnW₉O₃₄)₂,其中含有少量的钌(≤0.2个原子),要么取代进入母体配合物中,要么以少量钌(n⁺)杂质的形式存在,至少在我们小组和另外两个小组的实验中是这样。从包括我们小组在内的两个研究小组制备的三个独立样品中获得的证据包括对大块样品的元素分析、单晶X射线衍射、对用于X射线衍射的同一批次单晶的元素分析、¹⁸³W NMR以及金刚烷氧化的氧摄取和产物测定研究。本文还重新研究了之前报道的1的两个晶体结构,它们似乎与母体多金属氧酸盐WZn₃(H₂O)₂(ZnW₉O₃₄)₂的结构非常相似。此外,我们报道单独的痕量钌,以[Ru(DMSO)₄Cl₂]的形式,或者单独的母体多金属氧酸盐WZn₃(H₂O)₂(ZnW₉O₃₄)₂,都能够产生相同的产物。更重要的是,WZn₃(H₂O)₂(ZnW₉O₃₄)₂加上通过分析发现的平均0.13当量的作为[Ru(DMSO)₄Cl₂]起始原料添加的钌的简单物理混合物,在动力学上比“WZnRu₂(III)(H₂O)(OH)(ZnW₉O₃₄)₂”,(1),的催化活性大约高2倍。简而言之,有力证据表明,作为之前报道的全无机双加氧酶催化作用基础的假定的“WZnRu₂(III)(H₂O)(OH)(ZnW₉O₃₄)₂”,(1),可能是不正确的。这并不意味着1不能存在甚至不存在,而是意味着(a)如果它之前确实被制备出来过,那么不存在可靠的合成方法,并且(b)[Ru(DMSO)₄Cl₂]加上WZn₃(H₂O)₂(ZnW₉O₃₄)₂前体的简单混合物对金刚烷羟基化的催化速度快约2倍,证据表明,这是通过自由基链自氧化机制发生的,而不是通过之前声称的基于新型全无机的双加氧酶催化作用。