Hendriks Rik, Van den Eynde Hilde, Coussement Werner
Johnson&Johnson, Beerse, Belgium.
Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2008;44(4):407-8.
Compliance with the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) principles of good laboratory practice (GLP) is discussed in particular as regards the responsibility of the management of a test facility (TF) when performing a monosite study as compared to the responsibility in a multisite study. Other issues of interest in this context are dealt with, such as the qualification and training for professionals and technicians, the meaning of validity of standard operating procedures (SOP), the relation between management and quality assurance (QA), the role played by study plans, test and reference items, archives, master schedule, communication lines, validation of methods and calibration, and related activities. Furthermore, the consequences for the TF management and sponsors during multisite studies are discussed, with particular regard to the existence of other responsibilities set forward by health authorities in countries with not negligible differences in the applicable regulations. Hence, the major question on the floor is whether one global set of GLP principles can be agreed upon which in turn can lead to one global submission file. It is firmly hoped that health authorities and industry, hand in hand, can actually optimize their interaction to the overall benefit of human health.
本文特别讨论了经济合作与发展组织(OECD)良好实验室规范(GLP)原则的遵守情况,具体涉及试验设施(TF)管理部门在进行单场所研究时与多场所研究时的责任对比。文中还探讨了这方面其他相关问题,如专业人员和技术人员的资质与培训、标准操作规程(SOP)有效性的意义、管理与质量保证(QA)的关系、研究计划、试验和对照品、档案、主进度表、沟通渠道、方法验证与校准以及相关活动所起的作用。此外,还讨论了多场所研究期间对TF管理部门和申办方的影响,尤其考虑到在适用法规存在显著差异的国家,卫生当局提出的其他责任。因此,当下的主要问题是能否就一套全球通用的GLP原则达成一致,进而形成一份全球申报文件。人们殷切希望卫生当局和行业能够携手合作,切实优化互动,以全面造福人类健康。