Gruber Aaron J, Hussain Rifat J, O'Donnell Patricio
Department of Anatomy & Neurobiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2009;4(4):e5062. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005062. Epub 2009 Apr 7.
Reward intake optimization requires a balance between exploiting known sources of rewards and exploring for new sources. The prefrontal cortex (PFC) and associated basal ganglia circuits are likely candidates as neural structures responsible for such balance, while the hippocampus may be responsible for spatial/contextual information. Although studies have assessed interactions between hippocampus and PFC, and between hippocampus and the nucleus accumbens (NA), it is not known whether 3-way interactions among these structures vary under different behavioral conditions. Here, we investigated these interactions with multichannel recordings while rats explored an operant chamber and while they performed a learned lever-pressing task for reward in the same chamber shortly afterward. Neural firing and local field potentials in the NA core synchronized with hippocampal activity during spatial exploration, but during lever pressing they instead synchronized more strongly with the PFC. The latter is likely due to transient drive of NA neurons by bursting prefrontal activation, as in vivo intracellular recordings in anesthetized rats revealed that NA up states can transiently synchronize with spontaneous PFC activity and PFC stimulation with a bursting pattern reliably evoked up states in NA neurons. Thus, the ability to switch synchronization in a task-dependent manner indicates that the NA core can dynamically select its inputs to suit environmental demands, thereby contributing to decision-making, a function that was thought to primarily depend on the PFC.
奖励摄取优化需要在利用已知奖励来源和探索新奖励来源之间取得平衡。前额叶皮层(PFC)及相关的基底神经节回路可能是负责这种平衡的神经结构,而海马体可能负责空间/情境信息。尽管已有研究评估了海马体与PFC之间以及海马体与伏隔核(NA)之间的相互作用,但尚不清楚这些结构之间的三方相互作用在不同行为条件下是否会发生变化。在此,我们在大鼠探索操作性条件反射箱时以及随后不久在同一箱子中执行习得的杠杆按压任务以获取奖励时,通过多通道记录来研究这些相互作用。在空间探索过程中,NA核心区域的神经放电和局部场电位与海马体活动同步,但在杠杆按压过程中,它们与PFC的同步性更强。后者可能是由于前额叶激活爆发对NA神经元的短暂驱动,因为在麻醉大鼠中的体内细胞内记录显示,NA的兴奋状态可与PFC的自发活动短暂同步,并且PFC以爆发模式进行刺激能可靠地诱发NA神经元的兴奋状态。因此,以任务依赖方式切换同步的能力表明,NA核心区域能够动态选择其输入以适应环境需求,从而有助于决策,而这一功能以前被认为主要依赖于PFC。