Wu R L
Division of Ecosystem Science and Conservation, College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, 98195-2100, Seattle, WA, USA.
Theor Appl Genet. 1997 Jan;94(1):104-14. doi: 10.1007/s001220050388.
Understanding the genetic mechanisms for the phenotypic plasticity and developmental instability of a quantitative trait has important implications for breeding and evolution. Two clonally replicated plantations of two 3-generation inbred pedigrees derived from the highly divergent species Populus trichocarpa and P. deltoides were used to examine the genetic control of macro- and micro-environmental sensitivities and their genetic relationships with the trait mean across two contrasting environments. For all stem-growth traits studied, the trait mean had a higher broad-sense heritability (H(2)) level than macroenvironmental sensitivity, both with much higher H(2) values than microenvironmental sensitivity. Genetic correlation analyses indicated that the trait mean was more or less independent of macro- or micro-environmental sensitivity in stem height. Thus, for this trait, the genetic difference in response to the two environments might be mainly due to epistasis between some regulatory loci for plasticity and loci for trait mean. However, for basal area and volume index, pleiotropic loci might be more important for their genetic differences between the two environments. No evidence was found to support Lerner's (1954) homeostasis theory in which macro- or microenvironmental sensitivity is the inverse function of heterozygosity.
了解数量性状表型可塑性和发育不稳定性的遗传机制对育种和进化具有重要意义。利用来自高度不同的物种毛果杨和三角叶杨的两个三代近交系谱的两个克隆复制种植园,研究了在两种不同环境下宏观和微观环境敏感性的遗传控制及其与性状均值的遗传关系。对于所有研究的茎生长性状,性状均值的广义遗传力(H(2))水平高于宏观环境敏感性,两者均远高于微观环境敏感性。遗传相关性分析表明,在茎高方面,性状均值或多或少独立于宏观或微观环境敏感性。因此,对于该性状,对两种环境响应的遗传差异可能主要归因于一些可塑性调控位点与性状均值位点之间的上位性。然而,对于断面积和材积指数,多效性位点对它们在两种环境间的遗传差异可能更为重要。未发现证据支持勒纳(1954年)的稳态理论,即宏观或微观环境敏感性是杂合性的反函数。