Lehmann Ann-Kristin, Osada Nani, Zantop Thore, Raschke Michael J, Petersen Wolf
Department of Trauma-, Hand-, and Reconstructive Surgery, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Waldeyerstr, 1, D-48149, Münster, Germany.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009 Aug;129(8):1127-32. doi: 10.1007/s00402-009-0869-x. Epub 2009 Apr 9.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of different widths of the bony bridge between the femoral AM and PL bundle tunnel and different fixation techniques on the structural properties of the graft/femur complex in double-bundle ACL reconstructions.
Double-bundle ACL reconstruction with a bony bridge between AM and PL bundle tunnel of 1 mm results in significantly lower structural properties of the graft/femur complex when compared to a bridge of 2 and 3 mm. Interference screw fixation significantly lowers the structural properties when compared to cortical fixation.
Controlled laboratory study.
Double-bundle ACL reconstructions using different bridge widths (1 mm, 2 mm, and 3 mm bridge) were loaded to failure after a cyclic loading protocol (1,000 cycles 0-200 N) and the structural properties were compared to a single-bundle ACL reconstruction group (n = 10 in each group). The structural properties of using a cortical button fixation were then compared to interference screw fixation (2 mm bridge). Statistical analyses were performed using a Mann-Whitney test (P < 0.05).
Double-bundle reconstructions with cortical button fixation (1, 2, and 3 mm bridge) showed significantly higher ultimate failure loads and stiffness and significantly lower elongation compared to single-bundle reconstructions. Double-bundle ACL reconstructions with a 1 mm bridge showed significantly reduced structural properties of the graft/femur complex compared to a 2 or 3 mm bridge. Aperture fixation led to significantly lower ultimate loads when compared to cortical fixation.
The bony bridge between the two femoral tunnels in double-bundle ACL reconstructions influences the stability of the graft/femur complex. Aperture fixation using interference screws shows inferior results when compared to cortical fixation.
The results suggest that the indication for anatomical ACL reconstruction may include the size of the lateral femoral condyle. In small knees, a second femoral tunnel may be difficult to locate with a minimum bridge width of 2 mm.
本研究的目的是评估股骨前内侧束(AM)和后外侧束(PL)束道之间不同宽度的骨桥以及不同固定技术对双束前交叉韧带(ACL)重建中移植物/股骨复合体结构特性的影响。
与2毫米和3毫米的骨桥相比,AM和PL束道之间骨桥为1毫米的双束ACL重建会导致移植物/股骨复合体的结构特性显著降低。与皮质骨固定相比,挤压螺钉固定会显著降低结构特性。
对照实验室研究。
在进行循环加载方案(1000次循环,0 - 200牛)后,对使用不同骨桥宽度(1毫米、2毫米和3毫米骨桥)的双束ACL重建进行加载直至破坏,并将结构特性与单束ACL重建组进行比较(每组n = 10)。然后将使用皮质纽扣固定的结构特性与挤压螺钉固定(2毫米骨桥)进行比较。使用曼-惠特尼检验进行统计分析(P < 0.05)。
与单束重建相比,采用皮质纽扣固定(1毫米、2毫米和3毫米骨桥)的双束重建显示出显著更高的极限破坏载荷和刚度,以及显著更低的伸长率。与2毫米或3毫米骨桥相比,1毫米骨桥的双束ACL重建显示移植物/股骨复合体的结构特性显著降低。与皮质骨固定相比,骨隧道固定导致极限载荷显著降低。
双束ACL重建中两个股骨隧道之间的骨桥会影响移植物/股骨复合体的稳定性。与皮质骨固定相比,使用挤压螺钉的骨隧道固定效果较差。
结果表明,解剖学ACL重建的指征可能包括股骨外侧髁的大小。在小膝关节中,可能难以定位第二个股骨隧道,最小骨桥宽度为2毫米。