Suppr超能文献

[利多卡因、利多卡因联合曲马多及利多卡因联合吗啡用于静脉区域麻醉的效果比较]

[Comparison of the effects of lidocaine, lidocaine plus tramadol and lidocaine plus morphine for intravenous regional anesthesia].

作者信息

Aslan Bilge, Izdeş Seval, Kesimci Elvin, Gümüş Tülin, Kanbak Orhan

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Agri. 2009 Jan;21(1):22-8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of lidocaine alone and those of morphine or tramadol when added to lidocaine for intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA) on tourniquet pain, the onset and regression time of motor and sensory block, the level and duration of analgesia, and analgesic consumption.

METHODS

After institutional approval and informed consent, 90 patients scheduled for forearm or hand surgery were enrolled and randomly assigned to one of three groups for administration of either 0.5% lidocaine (Group L), 0.5% lidocaine with 1.5 mg.kg(-1) tramadol (Group LT), or 0.5% lidocaine with 0.1 mg.kg(-1) morphine (Group LM) in a volume of 40 ml. The onset and duration of sensory and motor blocks, duration of analgesia and proximal and distal tourniquet, time to first pain medication, visual analog scale (VAS) scores, analgesic requirements in 24 hours, vital signs, and side effects were recorded.

RESULTS

Sensory block onset time was significantly shorter in Group LM compared with the other groups and also in Group LT compared to Group L. In addition, sensory block regression time was significantly shorter in Group L than in Group LM (p<0.05). There was a significant increase in VAS scores at the postoperative 4th and 5th hr in Group L (p<0.05). Mean arterial blood pressure was significantly reduced in Group LM at the time of tourniquet deflation (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

IVRA with lidocaine and morphine or tramadol improves postoperative analgesia and sensory block. However, these combinations provide no advantage on tourniquet pain, motor block quality, analgesia duration or analgesic consumption.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较单独使用利多卡因以及在静脉区域麻醉(IVRA)中利多卡因添加吗啡或曲马多后,对止血带疼痛、运动和感觉阻滞的起效及消退时间、镇痛水平和持续时间以及镇痛药物消耗量的影响。

方法

经机构批准并获得知情同意后,90例计划进行前臂或手部手术的患者入组,并随机分为三组,分别给予40ml的0.5%利多卡因(L组)、0.5%利多卡因加1.5mg·kg⁻¹曲马多(LT组)或0.5%利多卡因加0.1mg·kg⁻¹吗啡(LM组)。记录感觉和运动阻滞的起效及持续时间、镇痛持续时间、近端和远端止血带情况、首次使用止痛药物的时间、视觉模拟评分(VAS)、24小时内的镇痛需求、生命体征及副作用。

结果

LM组的感觉阻滞起效时间显著短于其他组,LT组也显著短于L组。此外,L组的感觉阻滞消退时间显著短于LM组(p<0.05)。L组术后第4小时和第5小时的VAS评分显著升高(p<0.05)。LM组在止血带放气时平均动脉血压显著降低(p<0.05)。

结论

利多卡因与吗啡或曲马多联合用于IVRA可改善术后镇痛和感觉阻滞。然而,这些联合用药在止血带疼痛、运动阻滞质量、镇痛持续时间或镇痛药物消耗量方面并无优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验