Eastridge Brian J, Stansbury Lynn G, Stinger Harry, Blackbourne Lorne, Holcomb John B
US Army Institute of Surgical Research, Fort Sam Houston, Texas 78234, USA.
J Trauma. 2009 Apr;66(4 Suppl):S48-50. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31819ce315.
Forward Surgical Teams (FST) provide forward deployed surgical care within the battle space. The next level of care in theater, the Combat Support Hospitals (CSH), are distinguished from the FST by advanced resource capabilities including more complex diagnostic imaging, laboratory support with blood banking, and intensive care units. This study was intended to assess the effect of FST capability on the outcome of seriously injured casualties in comparison to the CSH.
We reviewed all casualty records in the Joint Theater Trauma Registry database from April 2004 to April 2006. The study cohort included all US military battle casualties who were admitted to either a FST or a CSH and were not returned to duty within 72 hours. Data were tabulated and assessed for basic demographics, mechanism of injury, injury severity score, ventilator and critical care days, and mortality. Statistical inferences were made using Chi square and Student's t tests.
As of April 2006, the above information was available in the Joint Theater Trauma Registry on 2,617 US military battle casualties who survived to reach care at a FST and/or CSH. Of this population, 77 subsequently died of wounds and 2,540 survived. We found no significant difference in died of wounds rates between the sample populations or rates of ventilator or critical care days between the two groups, nor did controlling for injury severity score alter this picture. The most significant predictor of mortality in both these groups was head injury.
The disparity between the availability of the highest level of injury care and the ability to care for injury as soon as possible is an issue of central importance to both the civilian and military trauma care communities. Our analysis demonstrates that despite the operational and logistic challenges that burden the FST, this level of surgical care confers equivalent battlefield injury outcome results compared with the CSH.
前沿外科医疗队(FST)在战区内提供前沿部署的外科护理。战区内的下一级护理机构,即战斗支援医院(CSH),与前沿外科医疗队的区别在于其先进的资源能力,包括更复杂的诊断成像、具备血库的实验室支持以及重症监护病房。本研究旨在评估与战斗支援医院相比,前沿外科医疗队的能力对重伤员治疗结果的影响。
我们回顾了2004年4月至2006年4月联合战区创伤登记数据库中的所有伤亡记录。研究队列包括所有被收治到前沿外科医疗队或战斗支援医院且在72小时内未恢复执勤的美国军事战斗伤员。对数据进行列表整理,并评估基本人口统计学信息、受伤机制、损伤严重程度评分、呼吸机使用天数和重症监护天数以及死亡率。使用卡方检验和学生t检验进行统计推断。
截至2006年4月,联合战区创伤登记处掌握了上述2617名美国军事战斗伤员的信息,这些伤员在前沿外科医疗队和/或战斗支援医院接受治疗后存活。在这一群体中,77人随后因伤死亡,2540人存活。我们发现样本群体之间的伤死率、两组之间的呼吸机使用天数或重症监护天数均无显著差异,控制损伤严重程度评分也未改变这一情况。这两组中死亡率的最重要预测因素是头部受伤。
最高水平的创伤护理可及性与尽快进行创伤护理的能力之间的差距,是民用和军事创伤护理领域都极为重要的问题。我们的分析表明,尽管前沿外科医疗队面临着作战和后勤方面的挑战,但与战斗支援医院相比,这种外科护理水平能带来相当的战场创伤治疗结果。