Brown Kate V, Ramasamy A, McLeod J, Stapley Sarah, Clasper J C
Academic Department of Military Surgery and Trauma, Royal College of Defence Medicine, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
J Trauma. 2009 Apr;66(4 Suppl):S93-7; discussion S97-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31819cdcb0.
Despite modern advances, amputation is still a commonly performed operation in war. It is often difficult to decide whether to amputate after high-energy trauma to the lower extremity. To help guide this assessment, scoring systems have been developed with amputation threshold values. These studies were all conducted on a civilian population, encompassing a wide range of ages and methods of injury. The evidence for their sensitivity and specificity is inconclusive. The aim of this study was to assess the validity of the mangled extremity severity score (MESS), the only verified score, in a population of UK military patients with ballistic mangled extremity injuries.
We identified from the prospectively kept Joint Theater Trauma Registry all patients who had sustained ballistic lower limb open fractures during the recent conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan (May 2003-April 2008). Demographics were assessed using both the trauma audit and the hospital notes. Patients were retrospectively evaluated with the MESS system for lower extremity trauma. Those that required an amputation were compared with those that had successful limb salvage.
Seventy-seven military patients with 86 limbs who had ballistic mangled extremity injuries were identified, 22 of whom required amputation. The MESS did not help to decide whether or not an amputation was appropriate and in particular, the age was not relevant. A skeletal score of 4, while being associated with a higher amputation rate, was not predictive of its need. Most amputations were performed when an ischemic limb was present, and the general condition of the casualty precluded the lengthy reconstruction required for salvage.
The management of ballistic extremity injuries in military patients should be considered separate to that of civilians with high-energy trauma extremity injuries. The authors have identified important factors in the management, in particular the need for early amputation, of the military mangled extremity.
尽管现代医学取得了进步,但截肢仍是战争中常见的手术。下肢遭受高能创伤后,往往难以决定是否进行截肢。为了辅助这一评估,已开发出具有截肢阈值的评分系统。这些研究均针对 civilian population 开展,涵盖了广泛的年龄范围和受伤方式。其敏感性和特异性的证据尚无定论。本研究的目的是评估在英国患有弹道性肢体严重损伤的军事患者群体中,唯一经过验证的评分系统——肢体严重损伤评分(MESS)的有效性。
我们从前瞻性保存的联合战区创伤登记处中,识别出在伊拉克和阿富汗近期冲突(2003 年 5 月至 2008 年 4 月)期间遭受弹道性下肢开放性骨折的所有患者。使用创伤审计和医院记录评估人口统计学数据。对患者进行 MESS 系统的回顾性下肢创伤评估。将需要截肢的患者与成功保肢的患者进行比较。
确定了 77 名患有 86 条弹道性肢体严重损伤的军事患者,其中 22 人需要截肢。MESS 无助于决定是否适合进行截肢,特别是年龄与之无关。骨骼评分为 4 时,虽然截肢率较高,但并不能预测是否需要截肢。大多数截肢是在肢体缺血时进行的,伤员的总体状况不允许进行保肢所需的长时间重建。
军事患者弹道性肢体损伤的处理应与 civilian population 高能创伤性肢体损伤的处理分开考虑。作者确定了军事肢体严重损伤处理中的重要因素,特别是早期截肢的必要性。