Tanabe Kenneth K, Kulu Yakup
Division of Surgical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Gastrointest Cancer Res. 2007;1(4 Suppl 2):S42-6.
Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of liver tumors has quickly gained acceptance since its introduction in the early 1990s. This technique is increasingly being used to treat liver metastases from colorectal (CRC) cancers. Most of the published trials of RFA in CRC patients are retrospective analyses; no prospective comparisons of RFA vs. resection or chemotherapy are yet available. Nevertheless, conclusions that can be safely drawn from available data include that RFA effectively destroys very small tumors, it is minimally invasive, is better able to spare uninvolved liver than is liver resection, and is associated with lower treatment costs than surgical resection. The major limitation of RFA is the high rate of local recurrence in treated patients. Potential contributors to the high local recurrence rate are discussed, including the current RFA technique, large blood vessels serving as "heat sinks," potential islands of viable tumor cells within an ablated zone, and the need for improved methods of real-time feedback. Improved multidisciplinary evaluation and treatment planning are needed for better management of patient candidates for RFA. Furthermore, prospective studies with defined end points and detailed documentation of the RFA technique are needed.
自20世纪90年代初引入以来,肝肿瘤的射频消融(RFA)迅速得到认可。这项技术越来越多地用于治疗结直肠癌(CRC)的肝转移。大多数已发表的关于CRC患者RFA的试验都是回顾性分析;目前尚无RFA与切除或化疗的前瞻性比较。然而,从现有数据中可以安全得出的结论包括,RFA能有效破坏非常小的肿瘤,它微创,比肝切除更能保留未受累的肝脏,且与手术切除相比治疗成本更低。RFA的主要局限性是治疗患者的局部复发率高。文中讨论了导致高局部复发率的潜在因素,包括当前的RFA技术、作为“热沉”的大血管、消融区内潜在的存活肿瘤细胞岛,以及对改进实时反馈方法的需求。为了更好地管理RFA候选患者,需要改进多学科评估和治疗计划。此外,还需要进行具有明确终点和RFA技术详细记录的前瞻性研究。