Lancioni Giulio E, O'Reilly Mark F, Singh Nirbhay N, Sigafoos Jeff, Didden Robert, Oliva Doretta, Campodonico Francesca, de Pace Claudia, Chiapparino Claudia, Groeneweg Jop
Department of Psychology, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Res Dev Disabil. 2009 Sep-Oct;30(5):1084-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2009.03.004. Epub 2009 Apr 10.
The first of these two studies assessed whether 11 participants with multiple disabilities of 5.3-18.2 (M=10.7) years of age would succeed in combining a microswitch for accessing preferred environmental stimuli and a Voice Output Communication Aid (VOCA) for requesting social contact. The second study conducted a social validation assessment of the aforementioned microswitch-VOCA combination. Data showed that all participants learned to use the microswitch and the VOCA. Moreover, the 10 participants, who received a 1-month post-intervention check, largely maintained their responding. The social validation assessment indicated that the raters (i.e., 110 university psychology students) favored the combination of microswitch and VOCA over the microswitch or the VOCA alone, and hypothetical combinations of microswitches or VOCAs.
这两项研究中的第一项评估了11名年龄在5.3至18.2岁(平均年龄10.7岁)之间的多重残疾参与者能否成功将用于获取偏好环境刺激的微动开关与用于请求社交接触的语音输出沟通辅助设备(VOCA)结合使用。第二项研究对上述微动开关 - VOCA组合进行了社会效度评估。数据显示,所有参与者都学会了使用微动开关和VOCA。此外,接受了为期1个月干预后检查的10名参与者在很大程度上保持了他们的反应。社会效度评估表明,评分者(即110名大学心理学专业学生)更青睐微动开关和VOCA的组合,而不是单独的微动开关或VOCA,以及微动开关或VOCA的假设组合。