• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

5-羟色胺再摄取转运体占有率动态变化的差异,可能解释艾司西酞普兰相对于西酞普兰具有更优临床疗效的原因。

Differences in the dynamics of serotonin reuptake transporter occupancy may explain superior clinical efficacy of escitalopram versus citalopram.

作者信息

Kasper Siegfried, Sacher Julia, Klein Nikolas, Mossaheb Nilufar, Attarbaschi-Steiner Trawat, Lanzenberger Rupert, Spindelegger Christoph, Asenbaum Susanne, Holik Alexander, Dudczak Robert

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2009 May;24(3):119-25. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0b013e32832a8ec8.

DOI:10.1097/YIC.0b013e32832a8ec8
PMID:19367152
Abstract

Escitalopram the S-enantiomer of the racemate citalopram, is clinically more effective than citalopram in the treatment of major depressive disorder. However, the precise mechanism by which escitalopram achieves superiority over citalopram is yet to be determined. It has been hypothesized that the therapeutically inactive R-enantiomer competes with the serotonin-enhancing S-enantiomer at a low-affinity allosteric site on serotonin reuptake transporters (SERTs), and reduces the effectiveness of the S-enantiomer at the primary, high-affinity serotonin-binding site. This study summarizes the results of two recent single-photon emission computerized tomography studies measuring SERT occupancy in citalopram-treated and escitalopram-treated healthy volunteers, after a single dose and multiple doses (i.e. under steady-state conditions). The single-dose study showed no attenuating effect of R-citalopram. After multiple dosing, however, SERT occupancy was significantly reduced in the presence of R-citalopram. Under steady-state conditions, R-enantiomer concentrations were greater than for the S-enantiomer because of slower clearance of R-citalopram. A pooled analysis suggests that build-up of the R-enantiomer after repeated citalopram dosing may lead to increased inhibition of S-enantiomer occupancy of SERT. This review adds to the growing body of evidence regarding differences in the dynamics of SERT occupancy, that is, molecular mechanisms underlying the often-observed superior clinical efficacy of escitalopram compared with citalopram in major depressive disorder.

摘要

艾司西酞普兰是消旋体西酞普兰的S-对映体,在治疗重度抑郁症方面临床上比西酞普兰更有效。然而,艾司西酞普兰优于西酞普兰的确切机制尚未确定。据推测,治疗上无活性的R-对映体在5-羟色胺再摄取转运体(SERTs)上的低亲和力变构位点与增强5-羟色胺的S-对映体竞争,并降低S-对映体在主要的高亲和力5-羟色胺结合位点的有效性。本研究总结了两项最近的单光子发射计算机断层扫描研究的结果,这些研究测量了单次给药和多次给药后(即在稳态条件下),接受西酞普兰治疗和艾司西酞普兰治疗的健康志愿者的SERT占有率。单剂量研究显示R-西酞普兰没有减弱作用。然而,多次给药后,在存在R-西酞普兰的情况下,SERT占有率显著降低。在稳态条件下,由于R-西酞普兰清除较慢,R-对映体浓度高于S-对映体。一项汇总分析表明,重复服用西酞普兰后R-对映体的积累可能导致对SERT上S-对映体占有率的抑制增加。这篇综述增加了越来越多关于SERT占有率动力学差异的证据,即艾司西酞普兰在重度抑郁症中通常观察到的优于西酞普兰的临床疗效的分子机制。

相似文献

1
Differences in the dynamics of serotonin reuptake transporter occupancy may explain superior clinical efficacy of escitalopram versus citalopram.5-羟色胺再摄取转运体占有率动态变化的差异,可能解释艾司西酞普兰相对于西酞普兰具有更优临床疗效的原因。
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2009 May;24(3):119-25. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0b013e32832a8ec8.
2
In vivo imaging of serotonin transporter occupancy by means of SPECT and [123I]ADAM in healthy subjects administered different doses of escitalopram or citalopram.在健康受试者中,通过单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)和[123I]ADAM对给予不同剂量艾司西酞普兰或西酞普兰后的血清素转运体占有率进行体内成像。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2006 Oct;188(3):263-72. doi: 10.1007/s00213-006-0486-0. Epub 2006 Sep 6.
3
Higher serotonin transporter occupancy after multiple dose administration of escitalopram compared to citalopram: an [123I]ADAM SPECT study.与西酞普兰相比,艾司西酞普兰多次给药后血清素转运体占有率更高:一项[123I]ADAM单光子发射计算机断层扫描研究。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2007 Apr;191(2):333-9. doi: 10.1007/s00213-006-0666-y. Epub 2007 Jan 19.
4
Escitalopram versus citalopram: the surprising role of the R-enantiomer.艾司西酞普兰与西酞普兰对比:R-对映体的惊人作用。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2004 Jul;174(2):163-76. doi: 10.1007/s00213-004-1865-z.
5
[Escitalopram: a selective inhibitor and allosteric modulator of the serotonin transporter].艾司西酞普兰:一种5-羟色胺转运体的选择性抑制剂和变构调节剂
Encephale. 2007 Dec;33(6):965-72. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2007.11.001. Epub 2007 Dec 11.
6
[Escitalopram and citalopram: the unexpected role of the R-enantiomer].[艾司西酞普兰与西酞普兰:R-对映体的意外作用]
Encephale. 2007 Mar-Apr;33(2):179-87. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(07)91548-1.
7
Escitalopram.艾司西酞普兰
Drugs Today (Barc). 2004 Feb;40(2):121-31. doi: 10.1358/dot.2004.40.2.799424.
8
[Mechanisms of action of antidepressants: new data from Escitalopram].[抗抑郁药的作用机制:艾司西酞普兰的新数据]
Encephale. 2003 May-Jun;29(3 Pt 1):259-65.
9
The interaction of escitalopram and R-citalopram at the human serotonin transporter investigated in the mouse.在小鼠中研究艾司西酞普兰与R-西酞普兰在人5-羟色胺转运体上的相互作用。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2014 Dec;231(23):4527-40. doi: 10.1007/s00213-014-3595-1. Epub 2014 May 9.
10
PET measurement of serotonin transporter occupancy: a comparison of escitalopram and citalopram.5-羟色胺转运体占有率的正电子发射断层扫描测量:艾司西酞普兰与西酞普兰的比较
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2007 Dec;10(6):777-85. doi: 10.1017/S1461145706007486. Epub 2007 Jan 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Logic-based machine learning predicts how escitalopram attenuates cardiomyocyte hypertrophy.基于逻辑的机器学习预测艾司西酞普兰如何减轻心肌细胞肥大。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Mar 11;122(10):e2420499122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2420499122. Epub 2025 Mar 4.
2
The glutamatergic system in the development of stress-induced depression.应激诱导性抑郁发展过程中的谷氨酸能系统
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024 Sep 4;86(10):5930-5937. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002487. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
Sertraline versus escitalopram in South Asians with moderate to severe major depressive disorder: (SOUTH-DEP) a double-blind, parallel, randomized controlled trial.
舍曲林与艾司西酞普兰治疗南亚中度至重度重度抑郁症的疗效比较:(SOUTH-DEP)一项双盲、平行、随机对照试验
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023 Sep 5;85(10):4851-4859. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001185. eCollection 2023 Oct.
4
One-week escitalopram intake alters the excitation-inhibition balance in the healthy female brain.一周的依地普仑摄入改变了健康女性大脑的兴奋-抑制平衡。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2022 Apr 15;43(6):1868-1881. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25760. Epub 2022 Jan 22.
5
The sociodemographic and clinical profile of patients with major depressive disorder receiving SSRIs as first-line antidepressant treatment in European countries.在欧洲国家,接受 SSRIs 作为一线抗抑郁药物治疗的重度抑郁症患者的社会人口学和临床特征。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2022 Jun;272(4):715-727. doi: 10.1007/s00406-021-01368-3. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
6
A single dose of escitalopram blunts the neural response in the thalamus and caudate during monetary loss.单次服用艾司西酞普兰可削弱金钱损失期间丘脑和尾状核的神经反应。
J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2021 Apr 27;46(3):E319-E327. doi: 10.1503/jpn.200121.
7
Double blind, randomised trial to compare efficacy of escitalopram versus citalopram for interferon induced depression in hepatitis C patients.一项比较艾司西酞普兰与西酞普兰治疗丙型肝炎患者干扰素所致抑郁症疗效的双盲随机试验。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2020 Jul 19;19:100622. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100622. eCollection 2020 Sep.
8
The effect of a single dose of escitalopram on sensorimotor networks.单次艾司西酞普兰给药对感觉运动网络的影响。
Brain Behav. 2018 Jun;8(6):e00975. doi: 10.1002/brb3.975. Epub 2018 Apr 20.
9
R- and S-citalopram concentrations have differential effects on neuropsychiatric scores in elders with dementia and agitation.R-西酞普兰和S-西酞普兰浓度对患有痴呆和躁动的老年人的神经精神评分有不同影响。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Sep;82(3):784-92. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12997. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
10
Multimodal antidepressant vortioxetine increases frontal cortical oscillations unlike escitalopram and duloxetine--a quantitative EEG study in rats.多模式抗抑郁药伏硫西汀可增加额叶皮质振荡,与艾司西酞普兰和度洛西汀不同——一项大鼠定量脑电图研究
Br J Pharmacol. 2014 Sep;171(18):4255-72. doi: 10.1111/bph.12782.