Gowing Linda, Farrell Michael, Ali Robert, White Jason M
Discipline of Pharmacology, University of Adelaide, Frome Road, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia, 5005.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15(2):CD002024. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002024.pub3.
Withdrawal is a necessary step prior to drug-free treatment or as the end point of long-term substitution treatment.
To assess the effectiveness of interventions involving the use of alpha2-adrenergic agonists to manage opioid withdrawal.
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2008), MEDLINE (January 1966-July 2008), EMBASE (January 1985-2008 Week 31), PsycINFO (1967 to 7 August 2008) and reference lists of articles. We also contacted manufacturers in the field.
Controlled trials comparing alpha2-adrenergic agonists with reducing doses of methadone, symptomatic medications or placebo, or comparing different alpha2-adrenergic agonists to modify the signs and symptoms of withdrawal in participants who were opioid dependent.
One author assessed studies for inclusion and undertook data extraction. Inclusion decisions and the overall process were confirmed by consultation between all authors.
Twenty-four studies, involving 1631 participants, were included. Twenty-one were randomised controlled trials.Thirteen studies compared a treatment regime based on an alpha2-adrenergic agonist with one based on reducing doses of methadone. Diversity in study design, assessment and reporting of outcomes limited the extent of quantitative analysis.Alpha2-adrenergic agonists are more effective than placebo in ameliorating withdrawal, and despite higher rates of adverse effects, are associated with significantly higher rates of completion of treatment.For the comparison of alpha2-adrenergic agonist regimes with reducing doses of methadone, there were insufficient data for statistical analysis, but withdrawal intensity appears similar to or marginally greater with alpha2-adrenergic agonists, while signs and symptoms of withdrawal occur and resolve earlier. Participants stay in treatment longer with methadone. No significant difference was detected in rates of completion of withdrawal with adrenergic agonists compared to reducing doses of methadone, or clonidine compared to lofexidine. Clonidine is associated with more adverse effects than reducing doses of methadone. Lofexidine does not reduce blood pressure to the same extent as clonidine, but is otherwise similar to clonidine
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Clonidine and lofexidine are more effective than placebo for the management of withdrawal from heroin or methadone. No significant difference in efficacy was detected for treatment regimes based on clonidine or lofexidine, and those based on reducing doses of methadone over a period of around 10 days but methadone is associated with fewer adverse effects than clonidine, and lofexidine has a better safety profile than clonidine.
脱瘾是无药物治疗之前的必要步骤,或作为长期替代治疗的终点。
评估使用α2 - 肾上腺素能激动剂管理阿片类药物脱瘾的干预措施的有效性。
我们检索了Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(《Cochrane图书馆》2008年第3期)、MEDLINE(1966年1月至2008年7月)、EMBASE(1985年1月至2008年第31周)、PsycINFO(1967年至2008年8月7日)以及文章的参考文献列表。我们还联系了该领域的制造商。
对照试验比较α2 - 肾上腺素能激动剂与逐渐减少剂量的美沙酮、对症药物或安慰剂,或比较不同的α2 - 肾上腺素能激动剂以改善阿片类药物依赖参与者的脱瘾体征和症状。
一位作者评估纳入研究并进行数据提取。纳入决策和整个过程经所有作者协商确认。
纳入了24项研究,涉及1631名参与者。21项为随机对照试验。13项研究比较了基于α2 - 肾上腺素能激动剂的治疗方案与基于逐渐减少剂量美沙酮的治疗方案。研究设计、结局评估和报告的多样性限制了定量分析的程度。α2 - 肾上腺素能激动剂在改善脱瘾方面比安慰剂更有效,尽管不良反应发生率较高,但与显著更高的治疗完成率相关。对于α2 - 肾上腺素能激动剂方案与逐渐减少剂量美沙酮的比较,没有足够的数据进行统计分析,但α2 - 肾上腺素能激动剂的脱瘾强度似乎与美沙酮相似或略高,而脱瘾的体征和症状出现和消退更早。使用美沙酮时参与者接受治疗的时间更长。与逐渐减少剂量的美沙酮相比,肾上腺素能激动剂在脱瘾完成率方面未检测到显著差异,与可乐定相比,洛非西定在脱瘾完成率方面也未检测到显著差异。可乐定比逐渐减少剂量的美沙酮有更多不良反应。洛非西定降低血压的程度不如可乐定,但在其他方面与可乐定相似。
可乐定和洛非西定在管理海洛因或美沙酮脱瘾方面比安慰剂更有效。在为期约10天的时间里,基于可乐定或洛非西定的治疗方案与基于逐渐减少剂量美沙酮的治疗方案在疗效上未检测到显著差异,但美沙酮的不良反应比可乐定少,且洛非西定的安全性比可乐定好。