Skov Steven J
Royal Australasian College of Physicians, Darwin, NT.
Med J Aust. 2009 Apr 20;190(8):437-9. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2009.tb02494.x.
The Australian Government's "alcopops" tax legislation will soon be voted on by the Senate. This is the first time in memory that an alcohol taxation measure has been informed principally by public health concerns. Much debate surrounds the utility of alcohol taxation as a measure to reduce alcohol-related harm. However, the harms resulting from alcohol misuse in Australia are at unacceptable levels and action to reduce them is overdue. There is good evidence from Australia and internationally that taxation and price measures are among the most effective and cost-effective in reducing alcohol consumption and related harms. Recent alcohol sales data give an early indication that the alcopops tax is being effective in reducing consumption. Current alcohol tax policy is unwieldy and not well directed towards improving public health. A proportion of tax revenues dedicated to alcohol programs would assist public acceptance of the measures. A broad review of alcohol taxation policy is needed as part of a comprehensive approach to alcohol problems in Australia.
澳大利亚政府的“预调鸡尾酒”税收立法即将由参议院进行表决。这是人们记忆中首次主要出于公共卫生担忧而制定的一项酒精税措施。围绕酒精税作为减少与酒精相关危害的一项措施的效用,存在诸多争议。然而,澳大利亚酒精滥用造成的危害处于不可接受的水平,早就应该采取行动来减少这些危害了。澳大利亚和国际上都有充分证据表明,税收和价格措施是减少酒精消费及相关危害最有效且最具成本效益的措施之一。近期的酒精销售数据初步显示“预调鸡尾酒”税在减少消费方面正发挥作用。当前的酒精税政策繁杂且未能很好地针对改善公众健康。将一部分税收收入专门用于酒精项目将有助于公众接受这些措施。作为澳大利亚解决酒精问题综合方法的一部分,需要对酒精税收政策进行全面审查。