McGreevy P D, Oddie C, Burton F L, McLean A N
Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Vet J. 2009 Jul;181(1):12-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.03.005. Epub 2009 Apr 17.
This article examines the recently completed equid ethogram and shows how analogues of social interactions between horses may occur in various human-horse interactions. It discusses how some specific horse-horse interactions have a corresponding horse-human interaction - some of which may be directly beneficial for the horse while others may be unusual or even abnormal. It also shows how correspondent behaviours sometimes become inappropriate because of their duration, consistency or context. One analogue is unlikely to hold true for all horse-human contexts, so when applying any model from horse-horse interactions to human-horse interactions, the limitations of the model may eclipse the intended outcome of the intervention. These limitations are especially likely when the horse is being ridden. Such analyses may help to determine the validity of extrapolating intra-specific interactions to the inter-specific setting, as is advocated by some popular horse-training methods, and highlight the subsequent limitations where humans play the role of the 'alpha mare' or leader in horse handling and training. This examination provides a constructive framework for further informed debate and empirical investigation of the critical features of successful intra-specific interactions.
本文研究了近期完成的马行为图谱,并展示了马之间社会互动的类似情况如何可能出现在各种人与马的互动中。它讨论了一些特定的马与马之间的互动如何有相应的马与人之间的互动——其中一些互动可能对马直接有益,而另一些可能不寻常甚至异常。它还展示了相应行为有时如何因其持续时间、一致性或背景而变得不适当。一种类似情况不太可能适用于所有的人与马的情境,因此当将任何来自马与马互动的模型应用于人与马的互动时,该模型的局限性可能会使干预的预期结果黯然失色。当马被骑乘时,这些局限性尤其可能出现。这样的分析可能有助于确定将种内互动外推到种间环境的有效性,正如一些流行的马匹训练方法所主张的那样,并突出人类在马匹处理和训练中扮演“头马”或领导者角色时随之而来的局限性。这项研究为进一步就成功的种内互动的关键特征进行明智的辩论和实证调查提供了一个建设性的框架。