Department of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, PR China.
Eur J Radiol. 2010 Jul;75(1):98-103. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.03.032. Epub 2009 Apr 18.
To assess the accuracy of 64-slice multi-detector row computed tomography (MDCT) angiography in the evaluation of peripheral artery in-stent or peristent restenosis, with conventional digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as the reference standard.
Forty-one patients (30 men, 11 women; mean age, 69.8+/-9.2 years) with symptomatic peripheral arterial occlusive disease after peripheral artery stenting (81 stented lesions) underwent both conventional DSA and 64-slice MDCT angiography. Each stent was classified as evaluable or unevaluable, and every stent was divided into three segments (proximal stent, stent body, and distal stent), resulting in 243 segments. For evaluation, stenosis was graded as follows: 1, none or slight stenosis (<25%); 2, mild stenosis (25-49%); 3, moderate stenosis (50-74%); 4, severe stenosis or total occlusion (> or =75%). Two readers evaluated all CT angiograms with regard to narrowing of in-stent or peristent restenosis by consensus. Results were compared with findings of the DSA.
Of 81 stents, 62 (76.5%) were determined to be assessable. The metal artifact of the gold marker and motion artifact increased uninterpretability of the images of stents. Overall, 24 of 28 in-stent restenosis and 38 of 53 persistent restenosis were correctly detected by MDCT (85.7% and 71.7% sensitivity). In evaluable stents, 21 of 22 in-stent restenoses and 27 of 28 persistent restenosis were correctly detected (95.4% and 96.4% sensitivity). Additionally, as the grade of stenosis increases, the mean level of CT values in the stent lumina decreases linearly accordingly.
64-Slice MDCT has a high accuracy for the detection of significant in-stent or peristent restenosis of assessable stents in patients with peripheral artery stent implantation and therefore can be considered as a valuable noninvasive technique for stent surveillance.
以传统数字减影血管造影(DSA)为参考标准,评估 64 层多排螺旋 CT(MDCT)血管造影在外周动脉支架内或持续性再狭窄评估中的准确性。
41 例(30 例男性,11 例女性;平均年龄 69.8±9.2 岁)因外周动脉支架置入术后(81 个支架)出现症状性外周动脉闭塞性疾病,均行传统 DSA 和 64 层 MDCT 血管造影。每个支架分为可评估和不可评估两类,每个支架分为 3 个节段(近段支架、支架体和远段支架),共 243 个节段。狭窄程度分级如下:1 级,无狭窄或轻度狭窄(<25%);2 级,轻度狭窄(25%-49%);3 级,中度狭窄(50%-74%);4 级,重度狭窄或完全闭塞(>75%)。2 位读者对所有 CT 血管造影结果进行评估,以判断支架内或持续性再狭窄的狭窄程度。结果与 DSA 结果进行比较。
81 个支架中,62 个(76.5%)可评估。金标记物的金属伪影和运动伪影增加了支架图像的不可解读性。MDCT 正确检出 28 个支架内再狭窄中的 24 个(85.7%敏感性)和 53 个持续性再狭窄中的 38 个(71.7%敏感性)。在可评估支架中,MDCT 正确检出 22 个支架内再狭窄中的 21 个(95.4%敏感性)和 28 个持续性再狭窄中的 27 个(96.4%敏感性)。此外,随着狭窄程度的增加,支架管腔中的 CT 值平均值呈线性下降。
64 层 MDCT 对外周动脉支架置入术后患者可评估支架的显著支架内或持续性再狭窄具有较高的准确性,因此可以作为一种有价值的支架监测的无创技术。